Log in | Register

Is there still a place for the Swan–Ganz catheter? No

Jean-Louis Teboul| Maurizio Cecconi| Thomas W. L. Scheeren
Editorial
Volume 44, Issue 6 / June , 2018

Pages 957 - 959

No abstract available.

References

  1. Wiener RS, Welch HG (2007) Trends in the use of the pulmonary artery catheter in the United States, 1993–2004. JAMA 298:423–429
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  2. Richard C, Warszawski J, Anguel N, Deye N, Combes A, Barnoud D, Boulain T, Lefort Y, Fartoukh M, Baud F, Boyer A, Brochard L, Teboul JL, French Pulmonary Artery Catheter Study Group (2003) Early use of the pulmonary artery catheter and outcomes in patients with shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 290:2713–2720
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  3. Harvey S, Harrison DA, Singer M, Ashcroft J, Jones CM, Elbourne D, Brampton W, Williams D, Young D, Rowan K, PAC-Man study collaboration (2005) Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 366:472–477
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  4. Teboul JL, Saugel B, Cecconi M, De Backer D, Hofer CK, Monnet X, Perel A, Pinsky MR, Reuter DA, Rhodes A, Squara P, Vincent JL, Scheeren TW (2016) Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 42:1350–1359
  5. Monnet X, Marik PE, Teboul JL (2016) Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update. Ann Intensive Care 6:111
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  6. Vieillard-Baron A, Matthay M, Teboul JL, Bein T, Schultz M, Magder S, Marini JJ (2016) Experts’ opinion on management of hemodynamics in ARDS patients: focus on the effects of mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 42:739–749
  7. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, Monnet X, Anguel N, Richard C, Teboul JL (2007) Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 35:64–68
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  8. Monnet X, Teboul JL (2006) Invasive measures of left ventricular preload. Curr Opin Crit Care 12:235–240
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  9. Teboul JL, Andrivet P, Ansquer M, Besbes M, Rekik N, Lemaire F, Brun-Buisson C (1992) Bedside evaluation of the resistance of large and medium pulmonary veins in various lung diseases. J Appl Physiol 72:998–1003
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  10. Boussat S, Jacques T, Levy B, Laurent E, Gache A, Capellier G, Neidhardt A (2002) Intravascular volume monitoring and extravascular lung water in septic patients with pulmonary edema. Intensive Care Med 28:712–718
  11. Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB, Waxman K, Lee TS (1988) Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patients. Chest 94:1176–1186
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  12. Hayes MA, Timmins AC, Yau EH, Palazzo M, Hinds CJ, Watson D (1994) Elevation of systemic oxygen delivery in the treatment of critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 330:1717–1722
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  13. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, Jaeschke R, Mebazaa A, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL, Vincent JL, Rhodes A (2014) Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 40:1795–1815

Sign In

Connect with ICM

Top 5 Articles Editors Picks Supplement