Log in | Register

Polymyxin B hemoperfusion in endotoxemic septic shock patients without extreme endotoxemia: a post hoc analysis of the EUPHRATES trialOpen access

D. J. Klein| D. Foster| P. M. Walker| S. M. Bagshaw| H. Mekonnen| M. Antonelli
Original
Volume 44, Issue 12 / December , 2018

Pages 2205 - 2212

Abstract

Purpose

The EUPHRATES trial examined the impact of polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX) on mortality in patients with septic shock and endotoxemia, defined as EAA ≥ 0.60. No difference was found in 28-day all-cause mortality. However, the trial showed that in some patients with septic shock the burden of endotoxin activity was extreme (EAA ≥ 0.9). In a post hoc analysis, we evaluated the impact of PMX use in patients with septic shock and endotoxin activity measured between 0.6–0.89.

Methods

Post-hoc analysis of the EUPHRATES trial for the 194 patients with EAA ≥ 0.6–0.89 who completed two treatments (PMX or sham). The primary end point was mortality at 28 days adjusted for APACHE II score and baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP). Additional end points included changes in MAP, cumulative vasopressor index (CVI), median EAA reduction, ventilator-free days (VFD), dialysis-free days (DFD) and hospital length of stay. Subpopulations analyzed were site and type of infection and those with norepinephrine dose > 0.1 mcg/kg/min at baseline.

Results

At 28 days, 23 patients of 88 (26.1%) in the PMX group died versus 39 of 106 (36.8%) in the sham group [risk difference 10.7%, OR 0.52, 95% CI (0.27, 0.99), P = 0.047]. When unadjusted for baseline variables, P = 0.11. The 28-day survival time in the PMX group was longer than for the sham group [HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.33, 0.95) P = 0.03]. PMX treatment compared with sham showed greater change in MAP [median (IQR) 8 mmHg (− 0.5, 19.5) vs. 4 mmHg (− 4.0, 11) P = 0.04] and VFD [median (IQR) 20 days (0.5, 23.5) vs. 6 days (0, 20), P = 0.004]. There were no significant differences in other end points. There was a significant difference in mortality in PMX-treated patients with no bacterial growth on culture [PMX, 6/30 (20%) vs. sham, 13/31 (41.9%), P = 0.005]. The median EAA change in the population was − 12.9% (range: increase 49.2%–reduction 86.3%). The mortality in the above median EAA change group was PMX: 6/38 (15.7%) vs. sham 15/49 (30.6%), P = 0.08.

Conclusions

These hypothesis-generating results, based on an exploratory post hoc analysis of the EUPHRATES trial, suggest measurable responses in patients with septic shock and an EAA ≥ 0.6 to 0.89 on changes in mean arterial pressure, ventilator-free days and mortality.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01046669. Funding Spectral Medical Incorporated.

Keywords

References

  1. Danner RL, Elin RJ, Hosseini JM, Wesley RA, Reilly JM, Parillo JE (1991) Endotoxemia in human septic shock. Chest 99(1):169–175
    • View reference on publisher's website
  2. Angus DC, Birmingham MC, Balk RA et al (2000) E5 murine monoclonal antiendotoxin antibody in gram-negative sepsis: a randomized controlled trial. E5 Study Investigators. JAMA 283(13):1723–1730
    • View reference on publisher's website
  3. Dellinger RP, Tomayko JF, Angus DC et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of a phospholipid emulsion (GR270773) in Gram-negative severe sepsis: results of a phase II multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-finding clinical trial. Crit Care Med 37(11):2929–2938
    • View reference on publisher's website
  4. Levin M, Quint PA, Goldstein B et al (2000) Recombinant bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (rBPI21) as adjunctive treatment for children with severe meningococcal sepsis: a randomised trial. rBPI21 Meningococcal Sepsis Study Group. Lancet 356(9234):961–967
    • View reference on publisher's website
  5. McCloskey RV, Straube RC, Sanders C, Smith SM, Smith CR (1994) Treatment of septic shock with human monoclonal antibody HA-1A. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. CHESS Trial Study Group. Ann Intern Med 121(1):1–5
    • View reference on publisher's website
  6. Opal SM, Laterre PF, Francois B et al (2013) Effect of eritoran, an antagonist of MD2-TLR4, on mortality in patients with severe sepsis: the ACCESS randomized trial. JAMA 309(11):1154–1162
    • View reference on publisher's website
  7. Marshall JC, Foster D, Vincent JL et al (2004) Diagnostic and prognostic implications of endotoxemia in critical illness: results of the MEDIC study. J Infect Dis 190(3):527–534
    • View reference on publisher's website
  8. Shoji H (2003) Extracorporeal endotoxin removal for the treatment of sepsis: endotoxin adsorption cartridge (Toraymyxin). Ther Apher Dial 7(1):108–114. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-0968.2003.00005.x
    • View reference on publisher's website
  9. Ronco C, Klein DJ (2014) Polymyxin B hemoperfusion: a mechanistic perspective. Crit Care 9;18(3):309
    • View reference on publisher's website
  10. Cruz DN, Antonelli M, Fumagalli R et al (2009) Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in abdominal septic shock: the EUPHAS randomized controlled trial. JAMA 301(23):2445–2452
    • View reference on publisher's website
  11. Payen DM, Guilhot J, Launey Y et al (2015) Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in patients with septic shock due to peritonitis: a multicenter randomized control trial. Intensive Care Med 41(6):975–984
  12. Klein DJ, Foster D, Schorr CA, Kazempour K, Walker PM, Dellinger RP (2014) The EUPHRATES trial (Evaluating the use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in a randomized controlled trial of adults treated for endotoxemia and septic shock): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 15:218. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-218
    • View reference on publisher's website
  13. Dellinger RP, Bagshaw SM, Antonelli M et al (2018) Targeted Polymyxin-B hemoperfusion for the treatment of endotoxemia and septic shock: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (EUPHRATES). JAMA 20(14):1455–1463. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.14618
    • View reference on publisher's website
  14. Pocock Stuart J, Stone Gregg W (2016) The primary outcome fails—now what? N Engl J Med 375:861–870. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1510064
    • View reference on publisher's website
  15. Romaschin AD, Obiezu-Forster CV, Shoji H, Klein DJ (2017) Novel insights into the direct removal of endotoxin by polymyxin B hemoperfusion. Blood Purif 44(3):193–197
    • View reference on publisher's website
  16. Dünser MW, Ruokonen E, Pettilä V, Ulmer H, Torgersen C, Schmittinger CA, Jakob S, Takala J (2009) Association of arterial blood pressure and vasopressor load with septic shock mortality: a post hoc analysis of a multicenter trial. Crit Care 13(6):R181
    • View reference on publisher's website
  17. Standford Lab—Lab Test Guide. https://www.stanfordlab.com/LabTestGuide/. Accessed 01 May 2018
  18. Moya-Horno I, Viteri S, Karachaliou N, Rosell R (2018) Combination of immunotherapy with targeted therapies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ther Adv Med Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758834017745012
    • View reference on publisher's website
  19. Reck M, Rabe KF (2017) Precision diagnosis and treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 377:849–861
    • View reference on publisher's website
  20. Ferretti G, Ruberto F, Morabito V, Pugliese F (2010) Early management of endotoxemia using the endotoxin activity assay and polymyxin B-based hemoperfusion. Contrib Nephrol 167:91–101
    • View reference on publisher's website
  21. Cutuli SL, Artigas A, Fumagalli R et al (2016) Polymyxin-B hemoperfusion in septic patients: analysis of a multicenter registry. Ann Intensive Care 6(1):77
    • View reference on publisher's website
  22. Iwagami M, Yasunaga H, Noiri E, Horiguchi H, Fushimi K, Matsubara T, Yahagi N, Doi K (2016) Potential survival benefit of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in spetic shock patients on continuous renal replacement therapy: a propensity-matched analysis. Blood purif 42:9-17
    • View reference on publisher's website
  23. Zhou F, Peng Z, Murugan R, Kellum JA (2013) Blood purification and mortality in sepsis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Crit Care Med 41(9):2209–2220
    • View reference on publisher's website
  24. Chang T, Tu YK, Lee CT, Chao A, Huang CH, Wang MJ, Yeh YC (2017) Effects of polymyxin B hemoperfusion on mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a systemic review, meta-analysis update, and disease severity subgroup meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 45(8):e858–e864
    • View reference on publisher's website
  25. Venkatesh B, Finfer S, Cohen J et al (2018) Adjunctive glucocorticoid therapy in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med 378:797–808. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1705835
    • View reference on publisher's website
  26. Suffredini AF (2018) A role for hydrocortisone therapy in septic shock? N Engl J Med 378:860–861
    • View reference on publisher's website
  27. Srisawat N, Tungsanga S, Lumlertgul N et al (2018) The effect of polymyxin B hemoperfusion on modulation on human leukocyte antigen DR in severe sepsis patients. Crit Care 22:279. https://doi.org/10.1186/s3054-018-2077-y
    • View reference on publisher's website

Sign In

Connect with ICM

Top 5 Articles Editors Picks Supplement