Log in | Register

Understanding intensive care unit benchmarking

Jorge I. F. Salluh| Marcio Soares| Mark T. Keegan
Understanding the Disease
Volume 43, Issue 11 / November , 2017

Pages 1703 - 1707

No abstract available.

References

  1. Woodhouse D, Berg M, van der Putten J, Houtepen J (2009) Will benchmarking ICUs improve outcome? Curr Opin Crit Care 15:450–455
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  2. Keegan MT, Soares M (2016) What every intensivist should know about prognostic scoring systems and risk-adjusted mortality. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 28:264–269
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  3. Rhodes A, Moreno RP, Azoulay E et al (2012) Prospectively defined indicators to improve the safety and quality of care for critically ill patients: a report from the Task Force on Safety and Quality of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Intensive Care Med 38:598–605
  4. Garland A (2005) Improving the ICU: part 1. Chest 127:2151–2164
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  5. Rothen HU, Stricker K, Einfalt J et al (2007) Variability in outcome and resource use in intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 33:1329–1336
  6. Power GS, Harrison DA (2014) Why try to predict ICU outcomes? Curr Opin Crit Care 20:544–549
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  7. Kahn JM, Benson NM, Appleby D, Carson SS, Iwashyna TJ (2010) Long-term acute care hospital utilization after critical illness. JAMA 303:2253–2259
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  8. Reineck LA, Pike F, Le TQ, Cicero BD, Iwashyna TJ, Kahn JM (2014) Hospital factors associated with discharge bias in ICU performance measurement. Crit Care Med 42:1055–1064
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  9. Taori G, Ho KM, George C et al (2009) Landmark survival as an end-point for trials in critically ill patients—comparison of alternative durations of follow-up: an exploratory analysis. Crit Care 13:R128
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  10. Watson SR, Scales DC (2013) Improving intensive care unit quality using collaborative networks. Crit Care Clin 29:77–89
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  11. Noritomi DT, Ranzani OT, Monteiro MB et al (2014) Implementation of a multifaceted sepsis education program in an emerging country setting: clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in a long-term follow-up study. Intensive Care Med 40:182–191
  12. de Vos Maartje LG, van der Veer SN, Graafmans WC et al (2013) Process evaluation of a tailored multifaceted feedback program to improve the quality of intensive care by using quality indicators. BMJ Qual Saf 22:233–241
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  13. Ghassemi M, Celi LA, Stone DJ (2015) State of the art review: the data revolution in critical care. Crit Care 19:118
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  14. Iwashyna TJ, Liu V (2014) What’s so different about big data? A primer for clinicians trained to think epidemiologically. Ann Am Thorac Soc 11:1130–1135
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  15. Desautels T, Calvert J, Hoffman J et al (2016) Prediction of sepsis in the intensive care unit with minimal electronic health record data: a machine learning approach. JMIR Med Inform 4:e28
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  16. Pirracchio R, Petersen ML, Carone M et al (2015) Mortality prediction in intensive care units with the Super ICU Learner Algorithm (SICULA): a population-based study. Lancet Respir Med 3:42–52
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  17. Cox CE, Wysham NG, Kamal AH et al (2016) Usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome system for survivors of critical illness. Am J Crit Care 25:340–349
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed

Sign In

Connect with ICM

Top 5 Articles Editors Picks Supplement