Log in | Register

A randomized clinical trial of ultrasound-guided infra-clavicular cannulation of the subclavian vein in cardiac surgical patients: short-axis versus long-axis approach

Antonella Vezzani| Tullio Manca| Claudia Brusasco| Gregorio Santori| Luca Cantadori| Andrea Ramelli| Gianluca Gonzi| Francesco Nicolini| Tiziano Gherli| Francesco Corradi
Original
Volume 43, Issue 11 / November , 2017

Pages 1594 - 1601

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the success rate and safety of short-axis versus long-axis approaches to ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation.

Methods

A total of 190 patients requiring central venous cannulation following cardiac surgery were randomized to either short-axis or long-axis ultrasound-guided cannulation of the subclavian vein. Each cannulation was performed by anesthesiologists with at least 3 years’ experience of ultrasound-guided central vein cannulation (>150 procedures/year, 50% short-axis and 50% long-axis). Success rate, insertion time, number of needle redirections, number of separate skin or vessel punctures, rate of mechanical complications, catheter misplacements, and incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection were documented for each procedure.

Results

The subclavian vein was successfully cannulated in all 190 patients. The mean insertion time was significantly shorter (p = 0.040) in the short-axis group (69 ± 74 s) than in the long-axis group (98 ± 103 s). The short-axis group was also associated with a higher overall success rate (96 vs. 78%, p < 0.001), first-puncture success rate (86 vs. 67%, p = 0.003), and first-puncture single-pass success rate (72 vs. 48%, p = 0.002), and with fewer needle redirections (0.39 ± 0.88 vs. 0.88 ± 1.15, p = 0.001), skin punctures (1.12 ± 0.38 vs. 1.28 ± 0.54, p = 0.019), and complications (3 vs. 13%, p = 0.028).

Conclusions

The short-axis procedure for ultrasound-guided subclavian cannulation offers advantages over the long-axis approach in cardiac surgery patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Parienti JJ, Mongardon N, Megarbane B, Mira JP, Kalfon P, Gros A, Marque S, Thuong M, Pottier V, Ramakers M, Savary B, Seguin A, Valette X, Terzi N, Sauneuf B, Cattoir V, Mermel LA, du Cheyron D, Group SS (2015) Intravascular complications of central venous catheterization by insertion site. N Engl J Med 373:1220–1229
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  2. Parienti JJ, du Cheyron D, Timsit JF, Traore O, Kalfon P, Mimoz O, Mermel LA (2012) Meta-analysis of subclavian insertion and nontunneled central venous catheter-associated infection risk reduction in critically ill adults. Crit Care Med 40:1627–1634
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  3. Merrer J, De Jonghe B, Golliot F, Lefrant JY, Raffy B, Barre E, Rigaud JP, Casciani D, Misset B, Bosquet C, Outin H, Brun-Buisson C, Nitenberg G, French Catheter Study Group in Intensive Care (2001) Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 286:700–707
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  4. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, Lipsett PA, Masur H, Mermel LA, Pearson ML, Raad II, Randolph AG, Rupp ME, Saint S, Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (2011) Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin infect Dis 52:e162–e193
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  5. Domino KB, Bowdle TA, Posner KL, Spitellie PH, Lee LA, Cheney FW (2004) Injuries and liability related to central vascular catheters: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 100:1411–1418
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  6. Ruesch S, Walder B, Tramer MR (2002) Complications of central venous catheters: internal jugular versus subclavian access–a systematic review. Crit Care Med 30:454–460
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  7. Gualtieri E, Deppe SA, Sipperly ME, Thompson DR (1995) Subclavian venous catheterization: greater success rate for less experienced operators using ultrasound guidance. Crit Care Med 23:692–697
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  8. Fragou M, Gravvanis A, Dimitriou V, Papalois A, Kouraklis G, Karabinis A, Saranteas T, Poularas J, Papanikolaou J, Davlouros P, Labropoulos N, Karakitsos D (2011) Real-time ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation versus the landmark method in critical care patients: a prospective randomized study. Crit Care Med 39:1607–1612
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  9. Lalu MM, Fayad A, Ahmed O, Bryson GL, Fergusson DA, Barron CC, Sullivan P, Thompson C, Canadian Perioperative Anesthesia Clinical Trials Group (2015) Ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 43:1498–1507
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  10. Frankel HL, Kirkpatrick AW, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, Desai H, Evans D, Summerfield DT, Slonim A, Breitkreutz R, Price S, Marik PE, Talmor D, Levitov A (2015) Guidelines for the appropriate use of bedside general and cardiac ultrasonography in the evaluation of critically ill patients-part I: general ultrasonography. Crit Care Med 43:2479–2502
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  11. Shah A, Smith A, Panchatsharam S (2013) Ultrasound-guided subclavian venous catheterisation—is this the way forward? a narrative review. Int J Clin Pract 67:726–732
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  12. Chapman GA, Johnson D, Bodenham AR (2006) Visualisation of needle position using ultrasonography. Anaesthesia 61:148–158
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  13. Popovich MJ (2015) Ultrasound-guided vascular access in critical care: can a choice of real-time imaging axis view overcome the “curse of dimensionality”? Crit Care Med 43:920–921
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  14. Stone MB, Moon C, Sutijono D, Blaivas M (2010) Needle tip visualization during ultrasound-guided vascular access: short-axis vs long-axis approach. Am J Emerg Med 28:343–347
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  15. Blaivas M, Brannam L, Fernandez E (2003) Short-axis versus long-axis approaches for teaching ultrasound-guided vascular access on a new inanimate model. Acad Emerg Med 10:1307–1311
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  16. Vogel JA, Haukoos JS, Erickson CL, Liao MM, Theoret J, Sanz GE, Kendall J (2015) Is long-axis view superior to short-axis view in ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization? Crit Care Med 43:832–839
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  17. Sommerkamp SK, Romaniuk VM, Witting MD, Ford DR, Allison MG, Euerle BD (2013) A comparison of longitudinal and transverse approaches to ultrasound-guided axillary vein cannulation. Am J Emerg Med 31:478–481
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  18. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=NCT01927185&Search=Search. Accessed 24 Jan 2017
  19. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG (2010) CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 340:c869
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  20. Thrush A, Hartshorne T (1999) Peripheral vascular ultrasound. Elsevier, London
  21. Vezzani A, Brusasco C, Palermo S, Launo C, Mergoni M, Corradi F (2010) Ultrasound localization of central vein catheter and detection of postprocedural pneumothorax: an alternative to chest radiography. Crit Care Med 38:533–538
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  22. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  23. Lefrant JY, Muller L, De La Coussaye JE, Prudhomme M, Ripart J, Gouzes C, Peray P, Saissi G, Eledjam JJ (2002) Risk factors of failure and immediate complication of subclavian vein catheterization in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 28:1036–1041
  24. Chittoodan S, Breen D, O’Donnell BD, Iohom G (2011) Long versus short axis ultrasound guided approach for internal jugular vein cannulation: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Med Ultrasonogr 13:21–25
  25. Mahler SA, Wang H, Lester C, Skinner J, Arnold TC, Conrad SA (2011) Short- vs long-axis approach to ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access: a prospective randomized study. Am J Emerg Med 29:1194–1197
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  26. Rezayat T, Stowell JR, Kendall JL, Turner E, Fox JC, Barjaktarevic I (2016) Ultrasound-guided cannulation: time to bring subclavian central lines back. West J Emerg Med 17:216–221
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed

Sign In

Connect with ICM

Top 5 Articles Editors Picks Supplement