Log in | Register

Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU : Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003

Jean Carlet| Lambertus G. Thijs| Massimo Antonelli| Joan Cassell| Peter Cox| Nicholas Hill| Charles Hinds| Jorge Manuel Pimentel| Konrad Reinhart| Boyd Taylor Thompson
ESICM Statement
Volume 30, Issue 5 / May , 2004

Pages 770 - 784

Abstract

The jurors identified numerous problems with end of life in the ICU including variability in practice, inadequate predictive models for death, elusive knowledge of patient preferences, poor communication between staff and surrogates, insufficient or absent training of health-care providers, the use of imprecise and insensitive terminology, and incomplete documentation in the medical records. The jury strongly recommends that research be conducted to improve end-of-life care. The jury advocates a “shared” approach to end-of-life decision-making involving the caregiver team and patient surrogates. Respect for patient autonomy and the intention to honour decisions to decline unwanted treatments should be conveyed to the family. The process is one of negotiation, and the outcome will be determined by the personalities and beliefs of the participants. Ultimately, it is the attending physician’s responsibility, as leader of the health-care team, to decide on the reasonableness of the planned action. In the event of conflict, the ICU team may agree to continue support for a predetermined time. Most conflicts can be resolved. If the conflict persists, however, an ethics consultation may be helpful. Nurses must be involved in the process. The patient must be assured of a pain-free death. The jury of the Consensus Conference subscribes to the moral and legal principles that prohibit administering treatments specifically designed to hasten death. The patient must be given sufficient analgesia to alleviate pain and distress; if such analgesia hastens death, this “double effect” should not detract from the primary aim to ensure comfort.

Keywords

References

  1. Esteban A, Gordo F, Solsona JP, et al (2001) Withdrawing and withholding life support in the intensive care unit: a Spanish prospective multi-center observational study. Intensive Care Med 27:1744–1749
  2. McLean RF, Tarshis J, Mazer CD, Szalai JP (2000) Death in two Canadian intensive care units: institutional difference and changes over time. Crit Care Med 28:100–103
    • View reference on PubMed
  3. Ferrand E, Robert R, Ingrand P, Lemaire F; French LATAREA Group (2001) Withholding and withdrawal of life support in intensive care units in France: a prospective survey. Lancet 357:9–14
    • View reference on PubMed
  4. Prendergast TJ, Claessens MT, Luce JM (1998) A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 158:1163–1167
    • View reference on PubMed
  5. Vincent JL (1999) Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: the results of an ethical questionnaire. Crit Care Med 27:1626–1633
    • View reference on PubMed
  6. Vincent JL (1990) European attitudes towards ethical problems in intensive care medicine: results of an ethical questionnaire. Intensive Care Med 16:256–264
    • View reference on PubMed
  7. Winter B, Cohen S (1999) ABC of intensive care. Withdrawal of treatment. BMJ 319:306–308
    • View reference on PubMed
  8. Eidelman LA, Jakobson DJ, Pizov R, Geber D, Leibovitz L, Sprung CL (1998) Forgoing life-sustaining treatment in an Israeli ICU. Intensive Care Med 24:162–166
    • View reference on PubMed
  9. Melltorp G, Nilstun T (1997) The difference between withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment. Intensive Care Med 23:1264–1267
  10. [No authors listed] (1994) Predicting outcome in ICU patients. 2nd European Consensus Conference in Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 20:390–397
    • View reference on PubMed
  11. Hanson LC, Tulsky JA, Danis M (1997) Can clinical interventions change care at the end of life? Ann Intern Med 126:381–388
    • View reference on PubMed
  12. Johnson D, Wilson M, Cavanaugh B, Bryden C, et al (1998) Measuring the ability to meet family needs in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 26:266–271
  13. SUPPORT Principal Investigators (1995) A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA 274:1591–1598
    • View reference on PubMed
  14. Keenan SP, Mawdsley C, Plotkin D, Webster GK, Priestap F (2000) Withdrawal of life support: how the family feels, and why. J Palliat Care [Suppl] 16:S40–44
  15. Hofmann JC, Wenger NS, Davis RB, Teno J, Connors AF Jr, Desbiens N, Lynn J, Phillips RS (1997) Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. Ann Intern Med 127:1–12
    • View reference on PubMed
  16. Nelson JE, Meier DE, Oei EJ, Nierman DM, Senzel RS, Manfredi PL, Davis SM, Morrison RS (2001) Self-reported symptom experience of critically ill cancer patients receiving intensive care. Crit Care Med 29:277–282
    • View reference on PubMed
  17. Cuthbertson SJ, Margetts MA, Streat SJ (2000) Bereavement follow-up after critical illness. Crit Care Med 28:1196–1201
    • View reference on PubMed
  18. Knaus WA, Rauss A, Alperovitch A, Le Gall JR, Loirat P, Patois E, Marcus SE (1990) Do objective estimates of chances for survival influence decisions to withhold or withdraw treatment? The French Multicentric Group of ICU Research. Med Decis Making 10:163–171
    • View reference on PubMed
  19. Smedira NG, Evans BH, Grais LS, Cohen NH, Lo B, Cooke M, Schecter WP, Fink C, Epstein JE, May C (1990) Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. N Engl J Med 322:309–315
    • View reference on PubMed
  20. Robert R, Ferrand E; l’Association des Réanimateurs du Centre-Ouest (1996) Limitation et arrêt des thérapeutiques actives en réanimation: expérience de dix centres Rean. Urg 5:611–616
  21. Prendergast TJ, Luce JM (1997) Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 155:15–20
    • View reference on PubMed
  22. Keenan SP, Busche KD, Chen LM, McCarthy L, Inman KJ, Sibbald WJ (1997) A retrospective review of a large cohort of patients undergoing the process of withholding or withdrawal of life support. Crit Care Med 25:1324–1331
    • View reference on PubMed
  23. Pochard F, Azoulay E, Chevret S, et al (2001) French intensivists do not apply American recommendations regarding decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapy. Crit Care Med 29:1887–1892
    • View reference on PubMed
  24. Linde-Zwirble W, Angus DC, Griffin M, Watson RS, Clermont G (2000) ICU care at the end-of-life in America: an epidemiological study. Crit Care Med 28:A34
  25. Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P, Baras M, Bulow HH, Hovilehto S, Ledoux D, Lippert A, Maia P, Phelan D, Schobersberger W, Wennberg E, Woodcock T; Ethicus Study Group (2003) End of life practices in European intensive care units—the Ethicus study. JAMA 290:790–797
    • View reference on PubMed
  26. Azoulay E, Chevret S, Leleu G, et al (2000) Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med 28:3044–3049
    • View reference on PubMed
  27. Council of Europe (2000) Protection of the human rights and dignity of the terminally ill and the dying, Doc. 8888, 7 November 2000, Recommendation 1418 (1999), Reply from the Committee of Ministers, adopted at the 728th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies, 30 October 2000
  28. Society of Critical Care Medicine (1997) Consensus statement of the Society of Critical Care Medicine’s Ethics Committee regarding futile and other possibly inadvisable treatments. Crit Care Med 25:887–891
    • View reference on PubMed
  29. American College of Physicians (1998) Ethics manual, 4th edn. Ann Intern Med 128:576–594
    • View reference on PubMed
  30. American Thoracic Society (1991) Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Ann Intern Med 115:478–485
    • View reference on PubMed
  31. Borum ML, Lynn J, Zhong Z (2000) The effects of patient race on outcomes in seriously ill patients in SUPPORT: an overview of economic impact, medical intervention, and end-of-life decisions. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:S194–S198
    • View reference on PubMed
  32. Society of Critical Care Medicine (1992) Attitudes of critical care medicine professionals concerning forgoing life-sustaining treatments. The Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee. Crit Care Med 20:320–326
    • View reference on PubMed
  33. Cuttini M, Nadai M, Kaminiski M, et al (2000) End-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care: physicians’ self-reported practices in seven European countries. Lancet 355:2112–2118
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  34. Rebagliato M, Cuttini M, Broggin L, et al (2000) Neonatal end-of-life decision making. Physicians’ attitudes and relationship with self-reported practices in 10 European countries. JAMA 284:2451–2459
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  35. Blackhall LJ, Frank G, Murphy ST, et al (1999) Ethnicity and attitudes towards life sustaining technology. Soc Sci Med 48:1779–1789
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  36. Matsumura S, Bito S, Kahn K, Fukuhara S, Kagawa-Singer M, Wenger N (2002) Acculturation of attitudes toward end-of-life care: a cross-cultural survey of Japanese Americans and Japanese. J Gen Intern Med 17:531–539
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  37. Field MJ, Cassell CK (1997) Approaching death: improving care at the end-of-life. National Academy Press, Washington
  38. Kollef MH, Ward S (1999) The influence of access to a private attending physician on the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 27:2125–2132
    • View reference on PubMed
  39. Rapoport J, Gehlbach S, Lemeshow S, Teres D (1992) Resource utilization among in the intensive care unit: managed care versus traditional insurance. Arch Intern Med 152:2207–2212
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  40. Bach PB, Carson SS, Leff A (1998) Outcomes and resource utilization for patients with prolonged critical illness managed by university-based or community-based subspecialists. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 158:1410–1415
    • View reference on PubMed
  41. Schneiderman LJ, Gilmer T, Teetzel HD (2000) Impact of ethics consultations in the intensive care setting: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care Med 28:3920–3924
  42. Asch DA, Christakis NA (1996) Why do physicians prefer to withdraw some forms of life support over others? Intrinsic attributes of life-sustaining treatments are associated with physicians’ preferences. Med Care 34:103–111
    • View reference on PubMed
  43. Danis M, Mutran E, Garrett JM, Stearns SC, Slifkin RT, Hanson L, Williams JF, Churchill LR (1996) A prospective study of the impact of patient preferences on life-sustaining treatment and hospital cost. Crit Care Med 24:1811–1817
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  44. Schneiderman LJ, Pearlman RA, Kaplan RM, et al (1992) Relationship of general advance directive instructions to specific life-sustaining treatment preferences in patients with serious illness. Arch Intern Med 152:2114–2122
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  45. Fischer GS, Tulsky JA, Rose MR, Siminoff LA, Arnold RM (1998) Patient knowledge and physician predictions of treatment preferences after discussion of advance directives. J Gen Intern Med 13:447–454
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  46. Seckler AB, Meier DE, Mulvihill M, Cammer Paris BE (1991) Substituted judgment: how accurate are proxy predictions? Ann Intern Med 115:92–98
  47. Pochard F, Azoulay E, Chevret S, et al (2001) Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients: ethical hypothesis regarding decision-making capacity. Crit Care Med 29:1893–1897
  48. Jacob D (1998) Family members’ experiences with decision making for incompetent patients in the ICU: a qualitative study. Am J Crit Care 7:30–36
    • View reference on PubMed
  49. Kennard M, Speroff T, Puopolo A, Follen M, Mallatratt L, Phillips R, Desbiens N, Califf R, Connors A (1996) Participation of nurses in decision making for seriously ill adults. Clin Nurs Res 5:199–219
    • View reference on PubMed
  50. Eliasson A, Howard R, Torrington K, Dillard T, Phillips Y (1997) Do-not-resuscitate decisions in the medical ICU: comparing physician and nurse opinions. Chest 111:1106–1111
    • View reference on PubMed
  51. Abbott KH, Sago J, Breen C, Abernethy A, Tulsky J (2001) Families looking back: one year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support. Crit Care Med 29:197–201
    • View reference on PubMed
  52. Singer PA, Choudhry S, Armstrong J (1993) Public opinion regarding consent to treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc 41:112–116
    • View reference on PubMed
  53. Genuis SJ, Genuis SK, Chang WC (1994) Public attitudes toward the right to die. Can Med Assoc J 150:701–708
  54. Roupie E, Santin A, Boulme R, et al (2000) Patients’ preferences concerning medical information and surrogacy: results of a prospective study in a French emergency department. Intensive Care Med 26:52–56
  55. Sjokvist P, Nilstun T, Svantesson M, Berggren L (1999) Withdrawal of life support—who should decide? Differences in attitudes among the general public, nurses and physicians. Intensive Care Med 25:949–954
  56. Lilly CM, De Meo DL, Sonna LA, et al (2000) An intensive communication intervention for the critically ill. Am J Med 109:469–475
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  57. Tulsky JA, Chesney MA, Lo B (1995) How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients? J Gen Intern Med 10:436–442
    • View reference on PubMed
  58. Heyland DK, Cook DJ, Rocker GM, Dodek PM, Kutsogiannis DJ, Peters S, Tranmer JE, O’Callaghan CJ (2003) Decision making in the ICU: perspectives of the substitute decision maker. Intensive Care Med 29:75–82
    • View reference on PubMed
  59. Breen CM, Abernethy AP, Abbott KH, Tulsky JA (2001) Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units. J Gen Intern Med 16:283–289
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  60. Goold SD, Williams G, Arnold RM (2000) Conflicts regarding decisions to limit treatment: a differential diagnosis. JAMA 283:909–914
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  61. Truog RD, Cist AF, Brackett SE, et al (2001) Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: the Ethics Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 29:2332–2348
    • View reference on PubMed
  62. Azoulay E, Cattaneo I, Ferrand E, Pochard F (2001) L’Information au patient de Réanimation et à ses proches: le point de vue de la SRLF. Réanimation 10:571–581
  63. Rocker G, Dunbar S (2000) Withholding or withdrawal of life support: the Canadian Critical Care Society position paper. J Palliat Care 16:S53–62
    • View reference on PubMed
  64. Sulmasy DP, Pellegrino ED (1999) The rule of double effect: clearing up the double talk. Arch Intern Med 159:545–550
    • View reference on PubMed
  65. Quill TE, Dresser R, Brock DW (1997) The rule of double effect—a critique of its role in end-of-life decision making. N Engl J Med 337:1768–1771
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  66. Molter NC (1979) Needs of relatives of critically ill patients: a descriptive study. Heart Lung 8:332–339
    • View reference on PubMed
  67. Hickey M (1990) What are the needs of families of critically ill patients? A review of the literature since 1976. Heart Lung 19:401–415
    • View reference on PubMed
  68. Cook D, Rocker G, Marshall J, et al (2003) Withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in anticipation of death in the intensive care unit. New Engl J Med 349:1123–1132
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  69. Stevens L, Cook D, Guyatt G, Griffith L, Walter S, McMullin J (2002) Education, ethics, and end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 30:290–296
    • View reference on PubMed
  70. Curtis JR, Engelberg RA, Wenrich MD, et al (2002) Studying communication about end-of-life care during the ICU family conference: development of a framework. J Crit Care 17:147–160
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  71. Fallowfield L, Jenkins V, Farewell V, Saul J, Duffy A, Eves R (2002) Efficacy of a Cancer Research UK communication skills training model for oncologists: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359:650–656
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  72. Levy M (2001) Making a personal relationship with Death. In: Curtis JR, Rubenfeld GD (eds) Managing death in the intensive care unit: the transition from cure to comfort. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 31–36
  73. DuBoulay S, Saunders C (1984) The founder of the modern hospice movement. Hodder and Stoughton, London

Sign In

Connect with ICM

Top 5 Articles Editors Picks Supplement