Log in | Register

Efficient literature searching: a core skill for the practice of evidence-based medicine

Gordon Stuart Doig| Fiona Simpson
Volume 29, Issue 12 / December , 2003

Pages 2119 - 2127



Efficient literature searching and the application of formal rules of evidence in evaluating the clinical literature are the two key skills defining the practice of evidence-based medicine. Although clinicians embrace the concepts of evidence-based medicine, most identify limited personal time as the major barrier towards its implementation into daily practice. Busy clinicians who practice evidence-based medicine identify systematic reviews and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines as very useful resources.


This review presents a simple, easy-to-follow, three-step searching strategy that emphasises the use of powerful new PubMed features that allow clinicians to retrieve high-quality systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines and primary studies with a single mouse click. The overall effectiveness of the process is further improved by highlighting the major features of successful and unsuccessful literature searches.


At the end of this tutorial the reader should be able to conduct efficient and effective literature searches that support clinical decision making in under 10 minutes.



  1. Haynes R, McKibbon A, Fitzgerald D, Guyatt G, Walker C, Sackett D (1986) How to keep up with the medical literature. V. Access by personal computer to the medical literature. Ann Intern Med 105:810–824
  2. Haynes R, McKibbon A, Walker C, Ryan N, Fitzgerald D, Ramsden M (1990) Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings: a study of use and usefulness. Ann Intern Med 112:78–84
    • View reference on PubMed
  3. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1992) Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268:2420–2425
    • View reference on PubMed
  4. Clinicians for the Restoration of Autonomous Practice (CRAP) Writing Group (2002) EBM: unmasking the ugly truth. BMJ 325:1496–1498
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  5. Shea S (2002) PubMed and me: why my coughs are more productive than my searches. Can Med Assoc J 167:1347–1348
  6. McColl A, Smith H, White P, Field J (1998) General practitioners perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey. BMJ 316:361–365
    • View reference on PubMed
  7. Young J, Ward J (2001) Evidence-based medicine in general practice: beliefs and barriers amongst Australian GPs. J Eval Clin Pract 7:201–210
    • View reference on PubMed
  8. Sackett D (1997) So little time, and... Evid Based Med 2:39
  9. Cook D, Meade M, Fink M (1996) How to keep up with the critical care literature and avoid being buried alive. Crit Care Med 24:1757–1768
    • View reference on PubMed
  10. Smith R, Chalmers I (2001) Britain's gift: a "Medline" of synthesised evidence: worldwide free access to evidence-based resources could transform health care. BMJ 323:1437–1438
    • View reference on PubMed
  11. Kotzin S (2002) Medline and PubMed will be able to systhesise clinical data. BMJ 324:791
    • View reference on publisher's website
  12. Hersh W, Hickman D (1998) How well do physicians use electronic information retrieval systems? A framework for investigation and systematic review. JAMA 280:1347–1352
  13. Oxman A, Sackett D, Guyatt G, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1993) Users' guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. JAMA 270:2093–2095
    • View reference on PubMed
  14. Richardson W, Wilson M, Nishikawa J, Hayward R (1995) The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club 123:A12–A13
  15. Cook D, Sackett D, Spitzer W (1995) Methodological guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 48:167–171
    • View reference on PubMed
  16. Oxman A, Cook D, Guyatt G (1994) Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 272:1367–1371
    • View reference on PubMed
  17. Shojania K, Bero L (2001) Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy. Eff Clin Pract 4:157–162
    • View reference on PubMed
  18. Cook D, Greengold N, Ellrodt A, Weingarten S (1997) The relation between systematic reviews and practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 127:210–216
    • View reference on PubMed
  19. LeLorier J, Gregoire G, Benhaddad A, Lapierre J, Derderian F (1997) Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 337:536–542
    • View reference on PubMed
  20. Haynes R, Wilczynski N, McKibbon A, Walker C, Sinclair J (1994) Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1:447–458
  21. Kingsland L, Harbourt A (1993) COACH: applying UMLS knowledge sources in an expert searcher environment. Bull Med Library Assoc 81:178–183
  22. Hersh W, Crabtree M, Hickam D, Sacherek M, Friedman C, Tidmarsh P, Mosbaek C, Kraemer D (2002) Factors associated with success in searching Medline and applying evidence to answer clinical questions. J Am Informatics Assoc 9:283–293
    • View reference on publisher's website

Sign In

Connect with ICM

Top 5 Articles Editors Picks Supplement