Log in | Register

Clinical practice guidelines: From methodological to practical issues

N. Roche| Dr. P. Durieux
Review Articles
Volume 20, Issue 8 / November , 1994

Pages 593 - 601

Abstract

The main goal of clinical practice guidelines is to help clinical decision by practitioners, who can not integrate in their daily practice all the published data concerning new technologies and knowledge. Guidelines also have growing applications in the ethical, legal, socio-economic, public policy and health care funding fields. This article describes the various methodologies that have been proposed to develop guidelines. These methods rely to varying degrees on formal methods of analysis of scientific evidence and expert opinions. Then a step by step process is described, that should ensure a rigorous, feasible and explicit guideline development and lead to valid and applicable recommendations. In order for guidelines to be used, they have to be efficiently implemented. Respective efficiency and justification of educational and coercive methods of implementation are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Wennberg J, Gittelsohn A (1973) Small area variations in health care delivery. Science 182:1102–1108
  2. Wennberg J, Gittelsohn A (1982) Variations in medical care among small areas: Sci Am 246:120–134
  3. Chassin MR, Brook RH, Park RE, Keesey J, Fink A, Kosecoff J, Kahn K, Merrick N, Solomon DH (1986) Variations in the use of medical and surgical services by the medicare population. N Engl J Med 314:285–290
  4. Chassin Mr, Kosecoff J, Park RE, Winslow CM, Kahn KL, Merrick NJ, Keesey J, Fink A, Solomon DH, Brook RH (1987) Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services? A study of three procedures. JAMA 1987, 258, 2533–2537
  5. Woolf SH (1990) Practice guidelines: a new reality in medicine. I. Recent developments. Arch Intern Med 150:1811–1818
  6. Institute of Medicine (1990) Council on Health Care Technology. Consensus development at the NH: improving the program. National Academy Press, Washington
  7. Andreasen PB (1988) Consensus conferences in different countries. Aims and perspectives. Int Technol Assess Health Care 4:305–308
  8. Institute of Medicine (1990) Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical Practice Guideline. Directions for a new program. National Academy Press, Washington
  9. Park RE, Fink A, Brook RH (1986) Physician rating of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures. Am J Public Health 76:766–772
  10. Woolf SH (1992) Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine. II. Methods of developing guidelines. Arch Intern Med 152:946–952
  11. Eddy DM (1990) Practice policies: where do they come from? JAMA 263:1265, 1269, 1272, 1275
  12. Office of Medical Applications of Research (1988) Guidelines for the selection and management of consensus development conferences. National Institute of Health, September
  13. Council on Health Care Technology (1990) Improving consensus for health technology assessment: an international perspective. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington
  14. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination (1979) The periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J 121:1193–1254
  15. US Preventive Services Task Force (1989) Guide to clinical preventive services: an assessment of the effectiveness of 169 interventions. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
  16. Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Laupacis A, Sackett DL (1992) Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 102 [Suppl] 305S-311S
  17. Brook RH (1989) Practice guidelines and practicing medicine. Are they compatible? JAMA 262:3027–3030
  18. Chassin MR (1990) Practice guidelines: best hope for quality improvement in the 1990s. J Occup Med 32:1199–1206
  19. White LJ, Ball JR (1985) The clinical efficacy project of the American College of Physicians. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1:169–174
  20. Woolf S-H (1991) Manual for clinical practice guideline development: a protocol for experts panels convened by the office of the forum for quality and effectiveness in health care. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, Md
  21. Eddy DM (1990) Guidelines for policy statements: the explicit appraoch: JAMA 263:2239–2243
  22. Battista RN, Fletcher SW (1988) Making recommendations on preventive practices: methodological issues. Am J Prev Med 4:53–67
  23. Eddy DM (1990) Practice policies: guidelines for methods. JAMA 263:1839–1841
  24. General Accounting Office (1991) Practice guidelines: the experience of medical specialty societies. Report to Congressional Requesters, Washington: GAO
  25. Health Services Research Group (1992) Standards, guidelines and clinical policies. Can Med Assoc J 146:833–837
  26. Woolf SH; Battista RN, Anderson GM, Logan AG, Wang E (1990) Assessing the clinical effectiveness of preventive maneuvers: analytic principles and systematic methods in reviewing evidence and developing clinical practice recommendations. A report by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. J Clin Epidemiol 43:891–905
  27. Eddy DM (1991) A manual for assessing health practices and designing practice policies. The explicit approach. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia
  28. Lara M, Goodman C (1990) National priorities for the assessment of clinical conditions and medical technologies. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington
  29. Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH (1984) Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 74:979–983
  30. Vinokur A, Burnstein E, Sechrest L, Wortman PM (1985) Group decision making by experts: field study of panels evaluating medical technologies. J Pers Soc Psychol 49:70–84
  31. Leape LL, Park RE, Kahan JP, Brook RH (1992) Group judgments of appropriateness: the effect of panel composition. Qual Assur Health Care 4:151–159
  32. McMaster University Health Sciences Centre (1981) How to read clinical journals: V. To distinguish useful from useless or even harmful therapy. Can Med Assoc J 124:1156–1162
  33. McMaster University Health Sciences Centre (1981) How to read clinical journals: II. To learn about a diagnositc test. Can Med Assoc 124:703–710
  34. McMaster University Health Sciences Centre (1981) How to read clinical journals: III. To learn the clinical course and prognosis of a disease. Can Med Assoc J 124:869–872
  35. McMaster University Health Sciences Centre (1981) How to read clinical journals. IV. To determine etiology and causation. Can Med Assoc 124:985–990
  36. Jaeschke R, Sackett DL (1989) Research methods for obtaining primary evidence. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 5:503–519
  37. How to read a clinical journal. In: Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Tugwell P (eds) Clinical epidemiology. A basic science for clinical medicine, Little Brown and Co, Boston, pp 285–320
  38. Chalmers TC, Smith H, Blackburn B, Silverman B, Schroeder B, Reitman D, Ambroz A (1981) A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Controlled Clin Trials 2:31–49
  39. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH (1988) Guidelines for reading literature reviews. Can Med Assoc J 138:697–703
  40. Chalmers TC, Hewett P, Reitman D, Sachs HS (1989) Selection and evaluation of empirical research in technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 5:503–519
  41. Eddy DM (1990) Comparing benefits and harms: the balance sheet. JAMA 263:2493–2505
  42. Weinstein MC, Fineberg H (1990) Clinical decision analysis. Saunders, Philadelphia
  43. Thacker SB (1988) Meta-analysis: a quantitative approach to research integration. JAMA 259:1685–1689
  44. Eddy DM, Hasselblad V, Schachter RA (1990) A bayesian method for synthetizing evidence: the confidence profile method. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 6:31–55
  45. Delahaye F, Landrivon G, Ecochard R, Colin C (1991) Meta-analysis. Health Policy 19:185–196
  46. Drummond M, Stoddart G, Labelle R, Cushman R (1987) Health conomics: an introduction for clinicians. Ann Intern Med 107:88–92
  47. Eddy DM (1990) Connecting value and costs. Whom do we ask, and what doe we ask them? JAMA 264:1737–1739
  48. Eisenberg JM (1989) A guide to the economic analysis of clinical practices. JAMA 262:459–471
  49. Guyatt G, Drummond M, Stoddart G, Haynes B, Bennett K, Labelle R, Feeny D, Tugwell P (1986) Guidelines for the clinical and economic evaluation of health care technologies. Soc Sci Med 22:393–408
  50. Health Services Research Group (1992) Studying patients preferences in health care decision making. Can Med Assoc J 147: 859–864
  51. Eddy DM (1991) Rationing by patient choice. JAMA 265:105–108
  52. Eddy DM (1990) Guidelines for policy statements: the explicit approach. JAMA 263:2239–2243
  53. Linton AL, Peachey DK (1990) Guidelines for medical practice: the reasons why. Can Med Ass J 143:485–490
  54. Weinstein MC, Stason WB (1977) Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices. N Engl J Med 296: 716–721
  55. Drummond MF (1981) Welfare economics and cost benefit analysis in health care. Scot J Political Economy 28:125–145
  56. Harvey M, Roberts SCJ (1987) Clinical guidelines, medical litigation, and the current medical defence system. Lancet 1:145–147
  57. Irshfedl EB (1991) Should practice parameters be the standard of care in malpractice litigation? JAMA 266:2886–2891
  58. Brennan TA (1991) Practice guidelines and malpractice litigation: collision or cohesion? J Health Polit Policy Law 16:67–85
  59. Irshfeld EB (1991) Practice parameters and the malpractice liability of physicians. JAMA 263:1556–1562
  60. Grol R (1992) Implementing guidelines in general practice care. Qual Health Care 1:184–191
  61. Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW (1990) Clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 113:645–646
  62. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1992) Evidence-based medicine — a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268:2420–2425
  63. Grol R (1990) National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards. Br J Gen Pract 40:361–364
  64. Lomas J, Anderson GM, Domnick P, Vayda E, Enkin MW, Hannah WJ (1989) Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med 321:1306–1311
  65. Wortman PM, Vinokur A, Sechrest L (1988) Do consensus conferences work? A process evaluation of the NIH consensus development program. J Health Polit Policy Law 13:469–498
  66. Park RE, Fink A, Brook RH, Chassin MR, Kahn KL, Merrick NJ, Kosecoff J, Solomon DH (1989) Physician ratings of appropriate indications for three procedures: theoretical indications vs indications used in practice. Am J Public Health 79:445–447
  67. Lomas J (1991) Words without action? The production, dissemination, and impact of consensus recommendations. Annu Rev Publ Health 12:41–65
  68. Donabedian A (1989) Institutional and professional responsibilities in quality assurance. Qual Assur Health Care 1:3–11

Sign In

Connect with ICM

Top 5 Articles Editors Picks Supplement