Log in | Register

Conservative versus liberal oxygenation targets in critically ill children: the randomised multiple-centre pilot Oxy-PICU trial

Mark J. Peters| Gareth A. L. Jones| Daisy Wiley| Jerome Wulff| Padmanabhan Ramnarayan| Samiran Ray| David Inwald| Michael Grocott| Michael Griksaitis| John Pappachan| Lauran O’Neill| Simon Eaton| Paul R. Mouncey| David A. Harrison| Kathryn M. Rowan
Pediatric Original
Volume 44, Issue 8 / August , 2018

Pages 1240 - 1248

Abstract

Background

Oxygen saturation monitoring for children receiving respiratory support is standard worldwide. No randomised clinical trials have compared peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) targets for critically ill children. The harm of interventions to raise SpO2 to > 94% may exceed their benefits.

Methods

We undertook an open, parallel-group randomised trial of children > 38 weeks completed gestation and < 16 years of age receiving invasive or non-invasive respiratory support and supplemental oxygen who were admitted urgently to one of three paediatric intensive care units. A ‘research without prior consent’ approach was employed. Children were randomly assigned to a liberal oxygenation group (SpO2 targets > 94%) or a conservative oxygenation group (SpO2 = 88–92% inclusive). Outcomes were measures of feasibility: recruitment rate, protocol adherence and acceptability, between-group separation of SpO2 and safety. The Oxy-PICU trial was registered before recruitment: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03040570.

Results

A total of 159 children met the inclusion criteria, of whom 119 (75%) were randomised between April and July 2017, representing a rate of 10 patients per month per site. The mean time to randomisation from first contact with an intensive care team was 1.9 (SD 2.2) h. Consent to continue in the study was obtained in 107 cases (90%); the children’s parents/legal representatives were supportive of the consent process. The median (interquartile range, IQR) of time-weighted individual mean SpO2 was 94.9% (92.6–97.1) in the conservative oxygenation group and 97.5% (96.2–98.4) in the liberal group [difference 2.7%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.3–4.0%, p < 0.001]. Median (IQR) time-weighted individual mean FiO2 was 0.28 (0.24–0.37) in the conservative group and 0.37 (0.30–0.42) in the liberal group (difference 0.08, 95% CI 0.03–0.13, p < 0.001). There were no significant between-group differences in length of stay, duration of organ support or mortality. Two prespecified serious adverse events (cardiac arrests) occurred, both in the liberal oxygenation group.

Conclusion

A definitive clinical trial of peripheral oxygen saturation targets is feasible in critically ill children.

Keywords

References

  1. Vincent JL, De Backer D (2013) Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med 369:1726–1734. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1208943
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  2. Asfar P, Singer M, Radermacher P (2015) Understanding the benefits and harms of oxygen therapy. Intensive Care Med 41:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-3670-z
  3. Martin DS, Grocott MPW (2013) Oxygen therapy in critical illness. Crit Care Med 41:423–432. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826a44f6
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  4. PICANet (2017) Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network, pp1–51. https://www.picanet.org.uk/Audit/Annual-Reporting/PICANet_2017_Annual_Report_Tables_and_Figures_FINAL_v2.0.pdf
  5. Helmerhorst HJ, Schultz MJ, van der Voort PH et al (2014) Self-reported attitudes versus actual practice of oxygen therapy by ICU physicians and nurses. Ann Intensive Care 4:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-014-0023-y
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  6. de Graaff AE, Dongelmans DA, Binnekade JM, de Jonge E (2011) Clinicians’ response to hyperoxia in ventilated patients in a Dutch ICU depends on the level of FiO2. Intensive Care Med 37:46–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-010-2025-z
  7. Raman S, Ray S, Peters MJ (2016) Survey of oxygen delivery practices in UK paediatric intensive care units. Crit Care Res Pract 2016:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6312970
    • View reference on publisher's website
  8. Ray S, Rogers L, Raman S, Peters MJ (2016) Liberal oxygenation in paediatric intensive care: retrospective analysis of high-resolution SpO2 data. Intensive Care Med 43:146–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4606-y
  9. Elmer J, Scutella M, Pullalarevu R et al (2015) The association between hyperoxia and patient outcomes after cardiac arrest: analysis of a high-resolution database. Intensive Care Med 41:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3555-6
  10. Kilgannon JH, Jones AE, Parrillo JE et al (2011) Relationship between supranormal oxygen tension and outcome after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Circulation 123:2717–2722. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.110.001016
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  11. Sznycer-Taub NR, Lowery R, Yu S et al (2016) Hyperoxia is associated with poor outcomes in pediatric cardiac patients supported on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Crit Care Med 17:350–358. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000000655
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  12. Rincon F, Kang J, Maltenfort M et al (2014) Association between hyperoxia and mortality after stroke: a multicenter cohort study. Crit Care Med 42:387–396. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a27732
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  13. de Jonge E, Peelen L, Keijzers PJ et al (2008) Association between administered oxygen, arterial partial oxygen pressure and mortality in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care 12:R156. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc7150
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  14. Raman S, Prince NJ, Hoskote A et al (2016) Admission PaO2 and mortality in critically ill children: a cohort study and systematic review. Pediatr Crit Care Med 17:e444–e450. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000000905
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  15. Helmerhorst HJF, Schultz MJ, van der Voort PHJ et al (2015) Bench-to-bedside review: the effects of hyperoxia during critical illness. Crit Care 19:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0996-4
    • View reference on publisher's website
  16. SUPPORT Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver, NICHD Neonatal Research Network, Carlo WA, Finer NN et al (2010) Target ranges of oxygen saturation in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med 362:1959–1969. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0911781
    • View reference on publisher's website
  17. BOOST II United Kingdom Collaborative Group, BOOST II Australia Collaborative Group, BOOST II New Zealand Collaborative Group et al (2013) Oxygen saturation and outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 368:2094–2104. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1302298
    • View reference on publisher's website
  18. Panwar R, Hardie M, Bellomo R et al (2015) Conservative versus liberal oxygenation targets for mechanically ventilated patients—a pilot multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 193(1):43–51. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201505-1019OC
    • View reference on publisher's website
  19. Girardis M, Busani S, Damiani E et al (2016) Effect of conservative vs conventional oxygen therapy on mortality among patients in an intensive care unit. JAMA 316:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.11993
    • View reference on publisher's website
  20. Khoshnood A, Carlsson M, Akbarzadeh M et al (2015) The effects of oxygen therapy on myocardial salvage in ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with acute percutaneous coronary intervention: the supplemental oxygen in catheterized coronary emergency reperfusion (SOCCER) study. Cardiology 132:16–21. https://doi.org/10.1159/000398786
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  21. Stub D, Smith K, Bernard S et al (2015) Air versus oxygen in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation 131:2143–2150. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.114.014494
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  22. Hofmann R, James SK, Jernberg T et al (2017) Oxygen therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 377:1240–1249. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1706222
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  23. Cunningham S, Rodriguez A, Adams T et al (2015) Oxygen saturation targets in infants with bronchiolitis (BIDS): a double-blind, randomised, equivalence trial. Lancet 386:1041–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00163-4
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  24. Jones GAL, Ramnarayan P, Raman S et al (2017) Protocol for a randomised pilot multiple centre trial of conservative versus liberal oxygenation targets in critically ill children (Oxy-PICU). BMJ Open 7:e019253–e019258. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019253
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  25. O’Hara CB, Canter RR, Mouncey PR et al (2017) A qualitative feasibility study to inform a randomised controlled trial of fluid bolus therapy in septic shock. Arch Dis Child 103(1):28–32. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-312515
    • View reference on PubMed
  26. Asfar P, Schortgen F, Boisramé-Helms J et al (2017) Hyperoxia and hypertonic saline in patients with septic shock (HYPERS2S): a two-by-two factorial, multicentre, randomised, clinical trial. Lancet Respir Med 5:180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30046-2
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  27. Maitland K, Kiguli S, Opoka RO et al (2017) Children’s oxygen administration strategies trial (COAST): a randomised controlled trial of high flow versus oxygen versus control in African children with severe pneumonia. Wellcome Open Res 2:100. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.12747.1
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  28. Bhatt DL, Mehta C (2016) Adaptive designs for clinical trials. N Engl J Med 375:65–74. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1510061
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed

Sign In

Connect with ICM

Top 5 Articles Editors Picks Supplement