Log in | Register

A randomized controlled trial of daily sedation interruption in critically ill childrenOpen access

Nienke J. Vet| Saskia N. de Wildt| Carin W. M. Verlaat| Catherijne A. J. Knibbe| Miriam G. Mooij| Job B. M. van Woensel| Joost van Rosmalen| Dick Tibboel| Matthijs de Hoog
Pediatric Original
Volume 42, Issue 2 / February , 2016

Pages 233 - 244

Abstract

Purpose

To compare daily sedation interruption plus protocolized sedation (DSI + PS) to protocolized sedation only (PS) in critically ill children.

Methods

In this multicenter randomized controlled trial in three pediatric intensive care units in the Netherlands, mechanically ventilated critically ill children with need for sedative drugs were included. They were randomly assigned to either DSI + PS or PS only. Children in both study arms received sedation adjusted on the basis of validated sedation scores. Provided a safety screen was passed, children in the DSI + PS group received daily blinded infusions of saline; children in the PS group received blinded infusions of the previous sedatives/analgesics. If a patient’s sedation score indicated distress, the blinded infusions were discontinued, a bolus dose of midazolam was given and the ‘open’ infusions were resumed: DSI + PS at half of infusion rate, PS at previous infusion rate. The primary endpoint was the number of ventilator-free days at day 28. Data were analyzed by intention to treat.

Results

From October 2009 to August 2014, 129 children were randomly assigned to DSI + PS (n = 66) or PS (n = 63). The study was terminated prematurely due to slow recruitment rates. Median number of ventilator-free days did not differ: DSI + PS 24.0 days (IQR 21.6–25.8) versus PS 24.0 days (IQR 20.6–26.0); median difference 0.02 days (95 % CI −0.91 to 1.09), p = 0.90. Median ICU and hospital length of stay were similar in both groups: DSI + PS 6.9 days (IQR 5.2–11.0) versus PS 7.4 days (IQR 5.3–12.8), p = 0.47, and DSI + PS 13.3 days (IQR 8.6–26.7) versus PS 15.7 days (IQR 9.3–33.2), p = 0.19, respectively. Mortality at 30 days was higher in the DSI + PS group than in the PS group (6/66 versus 0/63, p = 0.03), though no causal relationship to the intervention could be established. Median cumulative midazolam dose did not differ: DSI + PS 14.1 mg/kg (IQR 7.6–22.6) versus PS 17.0 mg/kg (IQR 8.2–39.8), p = 0.11.

Conclusion

In critically ill children, daily sedation interruption in addition to protocolized sedation did not improve clinical outcome and was associated with increased mortality compared with protocolized sedation only.

Keywords

References

  1. Kollef MH, Levy NT, Ahrens TS, Schaiff R, Prentice D, Sherman G (1998) The use of continuous i.v. sedation is associated with prolongation of mechanical ventilation. Chest 114:541–548
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  2. Ista E, van Dijk M, Gamel C, Tibboel D, de Hoog M (2008) Withdrawal symptoms in critically ill children after long-term administration of sedatives and/or analgesics: a first evaluation. Crit Care Med 36:2427–2432
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  3. Hughes CG, Pandharipande PP (2011) Review articles: the effects of perioperative and intensive care unit sedation on brain organ dysfunction. Anesth Analg 112:1212–1217
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  4. Colville G, Kerry S, Pierce C (2008) Children’s factual and delusional memories of intensive care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 177:976–982
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  5. Deeter KH, King MA, Ridling D, Irby GL, Lynn AM, Zimmerman JJ (2011) Successful implementation of a pediatric sedation protocol for mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med 39:683–688
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  6. Curley MA, Wypij D, Watson RS, Grant MJ, Asaro LA, Cheifetz IM, Dodson BL, Franck LS, Gedeit RG, Angus DC, Matthay MA, Investigators RS, the Pediatric Acute Lung I, Sepsis Investigators N (2015) Protocolized sedation vs usual care in pediatric patients mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 313:379–389
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  7. Ista E, de Hoog M, Tibboel D, van Dijk M (2009) Implementation of standard sedation management in paediatric intensive care: effective and feasible? J Clin Nurs 18:2511–2520
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  8. Vet NJ, Ista E, de Wildt SN, van Dijk M, Tibboel D, de Hoog M (2013) Optimal sedation in pediatric intensive care patients: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 39:1524–1534
  9. Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O’Connor MF, Hall JB (2000) Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 342:1471–1477
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  10. Girard TD, Kress JP, Fuchs BD, Thomason JW, Schweickert WD, Pun BT, Taichman DB, Dunn JG, Pohlman AS, Kinniry PA, Jackson JC, Canonico AE, Light RW, Shintani AK, Thompson JL, Gordon SM, Hall JB, Dittus RS, Bernard GR, Ely EW (2008) Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (awakening and breathing controlled trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 371:126–134
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  11. Mehta S, Burry L, Cook D, Fergusson D, Steinberg M, Granton J, Herridge M, Ferguson N, Devlin J, Tanios M, Dodek P, Fowler R, Burns K, Jacka M, Olafson K, Skrobik Y, Hebert P, Sabri E, Meade M, Investigators S, Canadian Critical Care Trials G (2012) Daily sedation interruption in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients cared for with a sedation protocol: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 308:1985–1992
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  12. Anifantaki S, Prinianakis G, Vitsaksaki E, Katsouli V, Mari S, Symianakis A, Tassouli G, Tsaka E, Georgopoulos D (2009) Daily interruption of sedative infusions in an adult medical-surgical intensive care unit: randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs 65:1054–1060
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  13. Verlaat CW, Heesen GP, Vet NJ, de Hoog M, van der Hoeven JG, Kox M, Pickkers P (2014) Randomized controlled trial of daily interruption of sedatives in critically ill children. Paediatr Anaesth 24:151–156
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  14. Wildschut ED, Hanekamp MN, Vet NJ, Houmes RJ, Ahsman MJ, Mathot RA, de Wildt SN, Tibboel D (2010) Feasibility of sedation and analgesia interruption following cannulation in neonates on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Med 36:1587–1591
  15. Gupta K, Gupta VK, Jayashree M, Singhi S (2012) Randomized controlled trial of interrupted versus continuous sedative infusions in ventilated children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 13:131–135
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  16. Vet NJ, Verlaat CW, de Wildt SN, Tibboel D, de Hoog M (2012) Daily interruption of sedation in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 13:122–123 (author reply)
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  17. Vet NJ, de Wildt SN, Verlaat CW, Knibbe CA, Mooij MG, Hop WC, van Rosmalen J, Tibboel D, de Hoog M, on behalf of SKIC (2014) Daily interruption of sedation in critically ill children: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 15:55
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  18. Ista E, van Dijk M, Tibboel D, de Hoog M (2005) Assessment of sedation levels in pediatric intensive care patients can be improved by using the COMFORT ‘‘behavior’’ scale. Pediatr Crit Care Med 6:58–63
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  19. von Baeyer CL, Spagrud LJ, McCormick JC, Choo E, Neville K, Connelly MA (2009) Three new datasets supporting use of the numerical rating scale (NRS-11) for children’s self-reports of pain intensity. Pain 143:223–227
    • View reference on publisher's website
  20. Ista E, de Hoog M, Tibboel D, Duivenvoorden HJ, van Dijk M (2013) Psychometric evaluation of the Sophia observation withdrawal symptoms scale in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 14:761–769
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  21. Neunhoeffer F, Kumpf M, Renk H, Hanelt M, Berneck N, Bosk A, Gerbig I, Heimberg E, Hofbeck M (2015) Nurse-driven pediatric analgesia and sedation protocol reduces withdrawal symptoms in critically ill medical pediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth 25:786–794
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  22. Visser I, Dutch PICE study group (2013) Dutch Pediatric Intensive Care Evaluation, PICE Report 2010–2011
  23. Burry L, Rose L, McCullagh IJ, Fergusson DA, Ferguson ND, Mehta S (2014) Daily sedation interruption versus no daily sedation interruption for critically ill adult patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD009176
    • View reference on PubMed
  24. Kleiber N, Tromp K, Mooij MG, van de Vathorst S, Tibboel D, de Wildt SN (2015) Ethics of drug research in the pediatric intensive care unit. Paediatr Drugs 17:43–53
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  25. Weisbrodt L, McKinley S, Marshall AP, Cole L, Seppelt IM, Delaney A (2011) Daily interruption of sedation in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Am J Crit Care 20:e90–e98
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  26. Wickstrom G, Bendix T (2000) The “Hawthorne effect”—What did the original Hawthorne studies actually show? Scand J Work Environ Health 26:363–367
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed

Sign In

Connect with ICM

Top 5 Articles Editors Picks Supplement