Log in | Register

Is the volume of mechanically ventilated admissions to UK critical care units associated with improved outcomes?

Jason Shahin| D. A. Harrison| K. M. Rowan
Original
Volume 40, Issue 3 / March , 2014

Pages 353 - 360

Abstract

Background

It is unknown whether a volume–outcome relationship exists for mechanically ventilated admissions to UK critical care units. This study was conducted to evaluate the volume–outcome relationship for mechanically ventilated admissions to adult, general critical care units in the UK with a view to informing policy, service delivery and organisation of specialist, advanced respiratory care.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study using data from the Case Mix Programme Database was conducted. The primary exposure of interest was annual volume (absolute number) of mechanically ventilated admissions per critical care unit per year. The primary outcome was ultimate acute hospital mortality. A multivariable analysis was performed to assess the relationship between annual volume and outcome while adjusting for a priori selected confounders. Two interaction tests were performed. The first interaction test was between annual volume and admission type and the second between annual volume and initial acute severity of respiratory failure. Sensitivity analysis excluding volume outlier units and using restricted cubic splines to model volume was also performed.

Results

After adjusting for confounding, there was a significant relationship between annual volume and ultimate acute hospital mortality (p < 0.02). The first interaction test revealed a strong interaction between annual volume and admission type, with a more pronounced volume–outcome relationship for non-surgical admissions (p < 0.001). The second interaction test between annual volume and initial acute severity of respiratory failure was not statistically significant (p = 0.12). The analysis using restricted cubic splines demonstrated a similar graphical relationship but the results were not statistically significant (p = 0.87).

Conclusions

A volume–outcome relationship was demonstrated for mechanically ventilated admissions to adult, general critical care units in the UK. The relationship is sensitive to the modelling approach used.

Keywords

References

  1. UK Expert Group (2010) Management of severe refractory hypoxia in critical care in the UK in 2010. Report commissioned by the UK Department of Health, London
  2. Tilford JM, Simpson PM, Green JW, Lensing S, Fiser DH (2000) Volume-outcome relationships in pediatric intensive care units. Pediatrics 106:289–294
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  3. Ramnarayan P, Thiru K, Parslow RC, Harrison DA, Draper ES, Rowan KM (2010) Effect of specialist retrieval teams on outcomes in children admitted to paediatric intensive care units in England and wales: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 376:698–704
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  4. London Trauma Office (2010) London trauma system. http://www.Londontraumaoffice.nhs.uk/londons-trauma-system/about-the-london-trauma-system/. Accessed 30 Jan 2014
  5. Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR (2002) Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med 137:511–520
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  6. Kahn JM, Goss CH, Heagerty PJ, Kramer AA, O’Brien CR, Rubenfeld GD (2006) Hospital volume and the outcomes of mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 355:41–50
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  7. Darmon M, Azoulay E, Fulgencio JP, Garrigues B, Gouzes C, Moine P et al (2011) Procedure volume is one determinant of centre effect in mechanically ventilated patients. Eur Respir J 37:364–370
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  8. Kahn JM (2013) What’s new in ICU volume-outcome relationships? Intensive Care Med 39:1635–1637
  9. Shahin J, Harrison DA, Rowan KM (2012) Relation between volume and outcome for patients with severe sepsis in United Kingdom: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 344:e3394
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  10. Jones J, Rowan K (1995) Is there a relationship between the volume of work carried out in intensive care and its outcome? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 11:762–769
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  11. Gopal S, O’Brien R, Pooni J (2011) The relationship between hospital volume and mortality following mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. Minerva Anestesiol 77:26–32
    • View reference on PubMed
  12. Harrison DA, Brady AR, Rowan K (2004) Case mix, outcome and length of stay for admissions to adult, general critical care units in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Case Mix Programme Database. Crit Care 8:R99–111
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  13. Harrison DA, Rowan KM (2008) Outcome prediction in critical care: the ICNARC model. Curr Opin Crit Care 14:506–512
  14. Harrison DA, Parry GJ, Carpenter JR, Short A, Rowan K (2007) A new risk prediction model for critical care: the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) model. Crit Care Med 35:1091–1098
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  15. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  16. Royston P, Sauerbrei W (2008) Multivariable model-building: a pragmatic approach to regression analysis based on fractional polynomials for modelling continuos variables. Wiley, New York
  17. Kahn JM, Ten Have TR, Iwashyna TJ (2009) The relationship between hospital volume and mortality in mechanical ventilation: an instrumental variable analysis. Health Serv Res 44:862–879
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  18. Dres M, Tran TC, Aeqerter P, Rabbat A, Guidet B, Huchon G et al (2013) Influence of ICU case-volume on the management and hospital outcomes of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Crit Care Med 2013(41):1884–1892. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a2bd8
    • View reference on publisher's website
  19. Needham DM, Bronskill SE, Rothwell DM, Sibbald WJ, Pronovost PJ, Laupacis A et al (2006) Hospital volume and mortality for mechanical ventilation of medical and surgical patients: a population-based analysis using administrative data. Crit Care Med 34:2349–2354
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  20. Moran JL, Solomon PJ (2012) Mortality and intensive care volume in ventilated patients from 1995 to 2009 in the Australian and New Zealand binational adult patient intensive care database. Crit Care Med 40:800–812
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  21. Cooke CR, Kennedy EH, Wiitala WL, Almenoff PL, Sales AE, Iwashyna TJ (2012) Despite variation in volume, veterans affairs hospitals show consistent outcomes among patients with non-postoperative mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 40:2569–2575
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  22. Fernandez R, Altaba S, Cabre L, Lacueva V, Santos A, Solsona JF, Anon JM, Catalan RM et al (2013) Relationship between volume and survival in closed intensive care units is weak and apparent only in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 119:871–879
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  23. Wunsch H, Angus DC, Harrison DA, Collange O, Fowler R, Hoste EA et al (2008) Variation in critical care services across North America and Western Europe. Crit Care Med 36(2787–2793):e2781–e2789
  24. Wunsch H, Rowan KM, Angus DC (2007) International comparisons in critical care: a necessity and challenge. Curr Opin Crit Care 13:725–731
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  25. Urbach DR, Croxford R, MacCallum NL, Stukel TA (2005) How are volume-outcome associations related to models of health care funding and delivery? A comparison of the United States and Canada. World J Surg 29:1230–1233
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  26. Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Thompson BT, Hayden D, de Boisblanc B et al (2006) Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 354:2564–2575
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  27. Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A et al (2000) Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 342:1301–1308
    • View reference on publisher's website
  28. Pronovost PJ, Angus DC, Dorman T, Robinson KA, Dremsizov TT, Young TL (2002) Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review. JAMA 288:2151–2162
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  29. Kane SL, Weber RJ, Dasta JF (2003) The impact of critical care pharmacists on enhancing patient outcomes. Intensive Care Med 29:691–698
    • View reference on PubMed
  30. Curtis JR, Cook DJ, Wall RJ, Angus DC, Bion J, Kacmarek R et al (2006) Intensive care unit quality improvement: a “how-to” guide for the interdisciplinary team. Crit Care Med 34:211–218
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  31. Kahn JM, Branas CC, Schwab CW, Asch DA (2008) Regionalization of medical critical care: what can we learn from the trauma experience? Crit Care Med 36:3085–3088
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website

Sign In

Connect with ICM

Top 5 Articles Editors Picks Supplement