Log in | Register

The ETHICA study (part I): elderly’s thoughts about intensive care unit admission for life-sustaining treatments

F. Philippart| A. Vesin| C. Bruel| A. Kpodji| B. Durand-Gasselin| P. Garçon| M. Levy-Soussan| J. L. Jagot| N. Calvo-Verjat| J. F. Timsit| B. Misset| M. Garrouste-Orgeas
Original
Volume 39, Issue 9 / September , 2013

Pages 1565 - 1573

Abstract

Purpose

To assess preferences among individuals aged ≥80 years for a future hypothetical critical illness requiring life-sustaining treatments.

Methods

Observational cohort study of consecutive community-dwelling elderly individuals previously hospitalised in medical or surgical wards and of volunteers residing in nursing homes or assisted-living facilities. The participants were interviewed at their place of residence after viewing films of scenarios involving the use of non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV), invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and renal replacement therapy after a period of invasive mechanical ventilation (RRT after IMV). Demographic, clinical, and quality-of-life data were collected. Participants chose among four responses regarding life-sustaining treatments: consent, refusal, no opinion, and letting the physicians decide.

Results

The sample size was 115 and the response rate 87 %. Mean participant age was 84.8 ± 3.5 years, 68 % were female, and 81 % and 71 % were independent for instrumental activities and activities of daily living, respectively. Refusal rates among the elderly were 27 % for NIV, 43 % for IMV, and 63 % for RRT (after IMV). Demographic characteristics associated with refusal were married status for NIV [relative risk (RR), 2.9; 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI), 1.5–5.8; p = 0.002] and female gender for IMV (RR, 2.4; 95 %CI, 1.2–4.5; p = 0.01) and RRT (after IMV) (RR, 2.7; 95 %CI, 1.4–5.2; p = 0.004). Quality of life was associated with choices regarding all three life-sustaining treatments.

Conclusions

Independent elderly individuals were rather reluctant to accept life-sustaining treatments, especially IMV and RRT (after IMV). Their quality of life was among the determinants of their choices.

Keywords

References

  1. Nguyen YL, Angus DC, Boumendil A, Guidet B (2011) The challenge of admitting the very elderly to intensive care. Ann Intensive Care 1:29
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  2. Boumendil A, Somme D, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Guidet B (2007) Should elderly patients be admitted to the intensive care unit? Intensive Care Med 33:1252–1262
  3. Covinsky KE, Wu AW, Landefeld CS, Connors AF Jr, Phillips RS, Tsevat J, Dawson NV, Lynn J, Fortinsky RH (1999) Health status versus quality of life in older patients: does the distinction matter? Am J Med 106:435–440
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  4. Tabah A, Philippart F, Timsit JF, Willems V, Francais A, Leplege A, Carlet J, Bruel C, Misset B, Garrouste-Orgeas M (2010) Quality of life in patients aged 80 or over after ICU discharge. Crit Care 14:R2
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  5. Roch A, Wiramus S, Pauly V, Forel JM, Guervilly C, Gainnier M, Papazian L (2011) Long-term outcome in medical patients aged 80 or over following admission to an intensive care unit. Crit Care 15:R36
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  6. De Rooij SE, Govers AC, Korevaar JC, Giesbers AW, Levi M, De Jonge E (2008) Cognitive, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes of patients aged 80 and older who survived at least 1 year after planned or unplanned surgery or medical intensive care treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:816–822
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  7. Ehlenbach WJ, Hough CL, Crane PK, Haneuse SJ, Carson SS, Curtis JR, Larson EB (2010) Association between acute care and critical illness hospitalization and cognitive function in older adults. JAMA 303:763–770
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  8. Boumendil A, Aergerter P, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Guitonneau AL, Menn AM, Ginsburg C, Davido A, Pateron D, Somme D, Simon D, Guidet B (2010) Tri des patients pour l’admission en réanimation à partir des urgences: que déclarent les médecins et que font-ils en pratique? Réanimation 19:SO52
  9. Sprung CL, Carmel S, Sjokvist P, Baras M, Cohen SL, Maia P, Beishuizen A, Nalos D, Novak I, Svantesson M, Benbenishty J, Henderson B (2007) Attitudes of European physicians, nurses, patients, and families regarding end-of-life decisions: the ETHICATT study. Intensive Care Med 33:104–110
  10. Coulter A (2007) Time for a change Health Expect 10:209–210
    • View reference on publisher's website
  11. Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, Warner G, Moore M, Gould C, Ferrier K, Payne S (2001) Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ 323:908–911
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  12. Roter D (1989) Which facets of communication have strong effects on outcome? A meta-analysis. In: Steward M (ed) Communicating with medical patients. Sage Publications, Newbury Park
  13. Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R (2006) Patients’ preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. Patient Educ Couns 60:102–114
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  14. Garrouste-Orgeas M, Montuclard L, Timsit JF, Misset B, Christias M, Carlet J (2003) Triaging patients to the ICU: a pilot study of factors influencing admission decisions and patient outcomes. Intensive Care Med 29:774–781
    • View reference on PubMed
  15. Philippart F, Timsit JF, Tabah A, Vesin A, Kpodji A, Durand-Gassellin B, Bruel C, Max A, Lau N, Misset B (2012) Avis des octogénaires pour une admission en réanimation: Etude ETHICA. Réanimation 21:S38–S39
  16. David M, Starzec C (1996) Aisance à 60 ans, dépendance et isolement à 80 ans INSEE Première 447. http://www.insee.fr/fr/ffc/docs_ffc/ip447.pdf
  17. Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9:179–186
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  18. Katz S (1983) Assessing self-maintenance: activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. J Am Geriatr Soc 31:721–727
    • View reference on PubMed
  19. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leirer VO (1982) Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 17:37–49
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  20. Power M, Quinn K, Schmidt S (2005) Development of the WHOQOL-old module. Qual Life Res 14:2197–2214
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  21. Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA (2004) The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res 13:299–310
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  22. Lee J (1994) Odds ratio or relative risk for cross-sectional data? Int J Epidemiol 23:201–203
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  23. Garrouste-Orgeas M, Boumendil A, Pateron D, Aergerter P, Somme D, Simon T, Guidet B (2009) Selection of intensive care unit admission criteria for patients aged 80 years and over and compliance of emergency and intensive care unit physicians with the selected criteria: an observational, multicenter, prospective study. Crit Care Med 37:2919–2928
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  24. Garrouste-Orgeas M, Timsit JF, Montuclard L, Colvez A, Gattolliat O, Philippart F, Rigal G, Misset B, Carlet J (2006) Decision-making process, outcome, and 1-year quality of life of octogenarians referred for intensive care unit admission. Intensive Care Med 32:1045–1051
  25. Van Mil AH, Van Klink RC, Huntjens C, Westendorp RG, Stiggelbout AM, Meinders AE, Lagaay AM (2000) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation preferences in Dutch community-dwelling and hospitalized elderly people: an interaction between gender and quality of life. Med Decis Making 20:423–429
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  26. Valentin A, Jordan B, Lang T, Hiesmayr M, Metnitz PG (2003) Gender-related differences in intensive care: a multiple-center cohort study of therapeutic interventions and outcome in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 31:1901–1907
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  27. Chewning B, Bylund CL, Shah B, Arora NK, Gueguen JA, Makoul G (2012) Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 86:9–18
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  28. Formiga F, Chivite D, Ortega C, Casas S, Ramon JM, Pujol R (2004) End-of-life preferences in elderly patients admitted for heart failure. QJM 97:803–808
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  29. Fried TR, Bradley EH, Towle VR (2002) Assessment of patient preferences: integrating treatments and outcomes. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 57:S348–S354
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  30. Fried TR, Bradley EH, Towle VR, Allore H (2002) Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients. N Engl J Med 346:1061–1066
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  31. Hansdottir H, Gruman C, Curry L, Judge JO (2000) Preferences for CPR among the elderly: the influence of attitudes and values. Conn Med 64:625–630
    • View reference on PubMed
  32. Hare J, Pratt C, Nelson C (1992) Agreement between patients and their self-selected surrogates on difficult medical decisions. Arch Intern Med 152:1049–1054
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  33. Kiphuth IC, Kohrmann M, Kuramatsu JB, Mauer C, Breuer L, Schellinger PD, Schwab S, Huttner HB (2010) Retrospective agreement and consent to neurocritical care is influenced by functional outcome. Crit Care 14:R144
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  34. Marco CA, Schears RM (2002) Societal opinions regarding CPR. Am J Emerg Med 20:207–211
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  35. Phillips RS, Wenger NS, Teno J, Oye RK, Youngner S, Califf R, Layde P, Desbiens N, Connors AF Jr, Lynn J (1996) Choices of seriously ill patients about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: correlates and outcomes. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments. Am J Med 100:128–137
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  36. Goodman MD, Tarnoff M, Slotman GJ (1998) Effect of advance directives on the management of elderly critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 26:701–704
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  37. Johnson RF Jr, Baranowski-Birkmeier T, O’Donnell JB (1995) Advance directives in the medical intensive care unit of a community teaching hospital. Chest 107:752–756
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  38. Teno JM, Gruneir A, Schwartz Z, Nanda A, Wetle T (2007) Association between advance directives and quality of end-of-life care: a national study. J Am Geriatr Soc 55:189–194
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  39. Silveira MJ, Kim SY, Langa KM (2010) Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. N Engl J Med 362:1211–1218
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  40. Kish Wallace S, Martin CG, Shaw AD, Price KJ (2001) Influence of an advance directive on the initiation of life support technology in critically ill cancer patients. Crit Care Med 29:2294–2298
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  41. Smith SK, Dixon A, Trevena L, Nutbeam D, McCaffery KJ (2009) Exploring patient involvement in healthcare decision making across different education and functional health literacy groups. Soc Sci Med 69:1805–1812
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website

Sign In

Connect with ICM

Top 5 Articles Editors Picks Supplement