Log in | Register

Weaning children from mechanical ventilation with a computer-driven protocol: a pilot trial

Philippe A. Jouvet| Valérie Payen| France Gauvin| Guillaume Emeriaud| Jacques Lacroix
Pediatric Original
Volume 39, Issue 5 / May , 2013

Pages 919 - 925

Abstract

Purpose

Duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation is decreased with the use of written protocols in adults. In children, the use of written protocols has not had such an impact.

Methods and measurements

We conducted a single-center trial to assess the feasibility of conducting a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing the duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation in those managed by a computer-driven explicit protocol versus usual care. Mechanically ventilated children aged between 2 and 17 years on pressure support and not receiving inotropes were included. After randomization, children were weaned either by usual care (n = 15) that was characterized by no protocolized decisions by attending physicians, or by a computer-driven protocol (Smartcare/PS™, Drager Medical) (n = 15). Weaning duration until first extubation was the primary outcome. For comparison, a Mann–Whitney U test was employed (p < 0.05).

Results

Patients characteristics at inclusion were similar. The median duration of weaning was 21 h (range 3–142 h) in the SmartCare/PS™ group and 90 h (range 4–552 h) in the usual care group, p = 0.007. The rate of reintubation within 48 h after extubation and the rate of noninvasive ventilation after extubation in the SmartCare/PS™ and usual care groups were 2/15 versus 1/15 and 2/15 versus 2/15, respectively.

Conclusions

A pediatric randomized trial on mechanical ventilation with a computerized protocol in North America is feasible. A computer-driven protocol that also manages children younger than 2 years old would help to decrease the number of PICU admissions screened in a multicentre trial on this topic.

Keywords

References

  1. Morris AH (2000) Developing and implementing computerized protocols for standardization of clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 132:373–383
    • View reference on PubMed
  2. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT (1993) Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 342:1317–1322
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  3. Grimm RH Jr, Shimoni K, Harlan WR Jr et al (1975) Evaluation of patient-care protocol use by various providers. N Engl J Med 292:507–511
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  4. Wirtschafter DD, Scalise M, Henke C et al (1981) Do information systems improve the quality of clinical research? Results of a randomized trial in a cooperative multi-institutional cancer group. Comput Biomed Res 14:78–90
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  5. Safran C, Rind DM, Davis RB et al (1996) Effects of a knowledge-based electronic patient record in adherence to practice guidelines. MD Comput 13:55–63
    • View reference on PubMed
  6. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H et al (2005) Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 293:1223–1238
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  7. Kollef MH, Shapiro SD, Silver P et al (1997) A randomized, controlled trial of protocol-directed versus physician-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 25:567–574
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  8. Ely EW, Baker AM, Dunagan DP et al (1996) Effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation of identifying patients capable of breathing spontaneously. N Engl J Med 335:1864–1869
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  9. Saura P, Blanch L, Mestre J et al (1996) Clinical consequences of the implementation of a weaning protocol. Intensive Care Med 22:1052–1056
  10. Smyrnios NA, Connolly A, Wilson MM et al (2002) Effects of a multifaceted, multidisciplinary, hospital-wide quality improvement program on weaning from mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 30:1224–1230
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  11. Foronda FK, Troster EJ, Farias JA et al (2011) The impact of daily evaluation and spontaneous breathing test on the duration of pediatric mechanical ventilation: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 39:2526–2533
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  12. Schultz TR, Lin RJ, Watzman HM et al (2001) Weaning children from mechanical ventilation: a prospective randomized trial of protocol-directed versus physician-directed weaning. Respir Care 46:772–782
    • View reference on PubMed
  13. Randolph AG, Wypij D, Venkataraman ST et al (2002) Effect of mechanical ventilator weaning protocols on respiratory outcomes in infants and children: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288:2561–2568
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  14. Meade MO, Ely EW (2002) Protocols to improve the care of critically ill pediatric and adult patients. JAMA 288:2601–2603
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  15. Phansalkar S, Weir CR, Morris AH et al (2008) Clinicians’ perceptions about use of computerized protocols: a multicenter study. Int J Med Inform 77:184–193
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  16. Lellouche F, Mancebo J, Jolliet P et al (2006) A multicenter randomized trial of computer-driven protocolized weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 174:894–900
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  17. Jouvet P, Farges C, Hatzakis G et al (2007) Weaning children from mechanical ventilation with a computer-driven system (closed-loop protocol): a pilot study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 8:425–432
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  18. Jouvet J, Ben Jaballah N, Hamlaoui M et al (2012) Organization and management of mechanical ventilation worldwide. In: Rimensberger P (ed) Textbook on pediatric and neonatal mechanical ventilation. Springer, Berlin
  19. Rose L, Presneill JJ, Johnston L et al (2008) A randomised, controlled trial of conventional versus automated weaning from mechanical ventilation using SmartCare/PS. Intensive Care Med 34:1788–1795
  20. Levine S, Nguyen T, Taylor N et al (2008) Rapid disuse atrophy of diaphragm fibers in mechanically ventilated humans. N Engl J Med 358:1327–1335
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  21. Jaber S, Petrof BJ, Jung B et al (2011) Rapidly progressive diaphragmatic weakness and injury during mechanical ventilation in humans. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 183:364–371
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  22. Farias JA, Retta A, Alia I et al (2001) A comparison of two methods to perform a breathing trial before extubation in pediatric intensive care patients. Intensive Care Med 27:1649–1654
  23. Payen V, Jouvet P, Lacroix J et al (2011) Risk factors associated with increased length of mechanical ventilation in children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 13:152–157
    • View reference on publisher's website
  24. Santschi M, Gauvin F, Hatzakis G et al (2007) Acceptable respiratory physiologic limits for children during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 33:319–325
  25. Ambuel B, Hamlett KW, Marx CM et al (1992) Assessing distress in pediatric intensive care environments: the COMFORT scale. J Pediatr Psychol 17:95–109
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  26. Slater A, Shann F, Pearson G (2003) PIM2: a revised version of the Paediatric Index of Mortality. Intensive Care Med 29:278–285
    • View reference on PubMed
  27. Leteurtre S, Martinot A, Duhamel A et al (2003) Validation of the paediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score: prospective, observational, multicentre study. Lancet 362:192–197
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website

Sign In

Connect with ICM

Top 5 Articles Editors Picks Supplement