Log in | Register

Bench testing of a new hyperbaric chamber ventilator at different atmospheric pressures

Jean-Claude Lefebvre| Aissam Lyazidi| Miguel Parceiro| Giuseppe F. Sferrazza Papa| Evangelia Akoumianaki| Deborah Pugin| Didier Tassaux| Laurent Brochard| Jean-Christophe M. Richard
Physiological and Technical Notes
Volume 38, Issue 8 / August , 2012

Pages 1400 - 1404



Providing mechanical ventilation is challenging at supra-atmospheric pressure. The higher gas density increases resistance, reducing the flow delivered by the ventilator. A new hyperbaric ventilator (Siaretron IPER 1000) is said to compensate for these effects automatically. The aim of this bench test study was to validate the compensation, define its limits and provide details on the ventilator’s output at varied atmospheric pressures.


Experiments were conducted inside a multiplace hyperbaric chamber at 1, 2.2, 2.8 and 4 atmospheres absolute (ATA), with the ventilator connected to a test lung. Transducers were recalibrated at each ATA level. Various ventilator settings were tested in volume and pressure control modes. Measured tidal volumes were compared with theoretical predictions based on gas laws.


Results confirmed the ventilator’s ability to provide compensation, but also identified its limits. The compensation range could be predicted and depended on the maximal flow attainable, decreasing linearly with increasing atmospheric pressure. With settings inside the range, tidal volumes approximated set values (mean error 10 ± 5 %). With settings outside the range, the volume was limited to the predicted maximal value calculated from maximal flow. A practical guide for clinicians is provided.


The IPER 1000 ventilator attempted to deliver stable tidal volume by adjusting the opening of the inspiratory valve in proportion to atmospheric pressure. Adequate compensation was observed, albeit only within a predictable range, which can be reliably predicted for each setting and ATA level combination. Setting a tidal volume outside this range can result in an unwanted decrease in minute ventilation.



  1. Weaver LK (2011) Hyperbaric oxygen in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 39:1784–1791
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  2. Skinner M (1998) Ventilator function under hyperbaric conditions. Diving Hyperb Med J 28:62–71
  3. Workman WT (1999) Hyperbaric facility safety: a practical guide. Best Pub. Co., Flagstaff
  4. Stahl W, Radermacher P, Calzia E (2000) Functioning of ICU ventilators under hyperbaric conditions–comparison of volume- and pressure-controlled modes. Intensive Care Med 26:442–448
  5. Stanga D, Beck G, Chimiak J (2003) Evaluation of respiratory support devices for use in the hyperbaric chamber. NEDU TR 03-18 Panama City, FL, Department of Defense, Navy Experimental Diving Unit
  6. Blanch PB, Desautels DA, Gallagher TJ (1989) Mechanical ventilator function under hyperbaric conditions. Undersea Hyperb Med 16 (Supp):17
  7. Lyazidi A, Thille AW, Carteaux G, Galia F, Brochard L, Richard JC (2010) Bench test evaluation of volume delivered by modern ICU ventilators during volume-controlled ventilation. Intensive Care Med 36:2074–2080
  8. Thille AW, Lyazidi A, Richard JC, Galia F, Brochard L (2009) A bench study of intensive-care-unit ventilators: new versus old and turbine-based versus compressed gas-based ventilators. Intensive Care Med 35:1368–1376
  9. West JB (1999) The original presentation of Boyle’s law. J Appl Physiol 87:1543–1545
    • View reference on PubMed
  10. Tassaux D, Jolliet P, Thouret JM, Roeseler J, Dorne R, Chevrolet JC (1999) Calibration of seven ICU ventilators for mechanical ventilation with helium-oxygen mixtures. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 160:22–32
    • View reference on PubMed
  11. Weaver LK, Greenway L, Elliot CG (1988) Performance of the Sechrist 500A hyperbaric ventilator in a monoplace hyperbaric chamber. J Hyperb Med 3:215–225
  12. Churchill S, Weaver LK, Haberstock D (1999) Performance of the Omni-vent mechanical ventilator for use with the monoplace hyperbaric chamber. Undersea Hyperb Med 26(Suppl):70–71
  13. Moon RE, Bergquist LV, Conklin B, Miller JN (1986) Monaghan 225 ventilator use under hyperbaric conditions. Chest 89:846–851
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  14. Hennessey PJ (2007) Evaluation of the UNI-VENT Eagle Model 754 ventilator for use in the surface recompression chambers (SRC) of the submarine rescue diving and recompression system (SRDRS). NEDU TR 07-03 Panama City, FL, Department of Defense, Navy Experimental Diving Unit

Sign In

Connect with ICM

Top 5 Articles Editors Picks Supplement