Log in | Register

Optimal level of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in severe viral bronchiolitis

Sandrine Essouri| Philippe Durand| Laurent Chevret| Laurent Balu| Denis Devictor| Brigitte Fauroux| Pierre Tissières
Pediatric Original
Volume 37, Issue 12 / December , 2011

Pages 2002 - 2007

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the optimal level of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in infants with severe hypercapnic viral bronchiolitis as assessed by the maximal unloading of the respiratory muscles and improvement of breathing pattern and gas exchange.

Methods

A prospective physiological study in a tertiary paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Breathing pattern, gas exchange, intrinsic end expiratory pressure (PEEPi) and respiratory muscle effort were measured in ten infants with severe hypercapnic viral bronchiolitis during spontaneous breathing (SB) and three increasing levels of nCPAP.

Results

During SB, median PEEPi was 6 cmH2O (range 3.9–9.2 cmH2O), median respiratory rate was 78 breaths/min (range 41–96), median inspiratory time/total duty cycle (Ti/Ttot) was 0.45 (range 0.40–0.48) and transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure (PtcCO2) was 61.5 mmHg (range 50–78). In all the infants, an nCPAP level of 7 cmH2O was associated with the greatest reduction in respiratory effort with a mean reduction in oesophageal and diaphragmatic pressure swings of 48 and 46%, respectively, and of the oesophageal and diaphragmatic pressure time product of 49 and 56%, respectively. During nCPAP, median respiratory rate decreased to 56 breaths/min (range 39–108, p < 0.05), median Ti/Ttot decreased to 0.40 (range 0.34–0.44, p < 0.50) and PtcCO2 decreased to 49 mmHg (range 35–65, p < 0.05). Only one infant with associated bacterial pneumonia required intubation and all the infants were discharged alive from the PICU after a median stay of 5.5 (range 3–27 days).

Conclusion

In infants with hypercapnic respiratory failure due to acute viral bronchiolitis, an nCPAP level of 7 cmH2O is associated with the greatest unloading of the respiratory muscles and improvement of breathing pattern, as well as a favourable short-term clinical outcome.

Keywords

References

  1. Deshpande SA, Northern V (2003) The clinical and health economic burden of respiratory syncytial virus disease among children under 2 years of age in a defined geographical area. Arch Dis Child 88:1065–1069
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  2. Brooks AM, McBride JT, McConnochie KM, Aviram M, Long C, Hall CB (1999) Predicting deterioration in previously healthy infants hospitalized with respiratory syncytial virus infection. Pediatrics 104:463–467
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  3. Le Souëf PN, England SJ, Stogryn HA, Bryan AC (1988) Comparison of diaphragmatic fatigue in newborn and older rabbits. J Appl Physiol 65:1040–1044
    • View reference on PubMed
  4. Larrar S, Essouri S, Durand P, Chevret L, Haas V, Chabernaud JL, Leyronnas D, Devictor D (2006) Effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure ventilation in infants with severe acute bronchiolitis. Arch Pediatr 13:1397–1403
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  5. Campion A, Huvenne H, Leteurtre S, Noizet O, Binoche A, Diependaele JF, Cremer R, Fourier C, Sadik A, Leclerc F (2006) Non-invasive ventilation in infants with severe infection presumably due to respiratory syncytial virus: feasibility and failure criteria. Arch Pediatr 13:1404–1409
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  6. Javouhey E, Barats A, Richard N, Stamm D, Floret D (2008) Non-invasive ventilation as primary ventilatory support for infants with severe bronchiolitis. Intensive Care Med 34:1608–1614
  7. Thia LP, McKenzie SA, Blyth TP, Minasian CC, Kozlowska WJ, Carr SB (2008) Randomised controlled trial of nasal continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) in bronchiolitis. Arch Dis Child 93:45–47
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  8. Cambonie G, Milési C, Jaber S, Amsallem F, Barbotte E, Picaud JC, Matecki S (2008) Nasal continuous positive airway pressure decreases respiratory muscles overload in young infants with severe acute viral bronchiolitis. Intensive Care Med 34:1865–1872
  9. (2001) Consensus conference on the management of infant bronchiolitis. Paris, France, 21 September 2000. Proceedings. Arch Pediatr 8(Suppl 1):1s–196s
  10. Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A (2005) International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care Med 6:2–8
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  11. Baydur A, Behrakis PK, Zin WA, Jaeger M, Milic-Emili J (1982) A simple method for assessing the validity of the esophageal balloon technique. Am Rev Respir Dis 126:788–791
    • View reference on PubMed
  12. Fauroux B, Nicot F, Essouri S, Hart N, Clément A, Polkey MI, Lofaso F (2004) Setting of non-invasive pressure support in young patients with cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J 24:624–630
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  13. Essouri S, Durand P, Chevret L, Haas V, Perot C, Clement A, Devictor D, Fauroux B (2008) Physiological effects of non-invasive positive ventilation during acute moderate hypercapnic respiratory insufficiency in children. Intensive Care Med 34:2248–2255
  14. Barnard PA, Levine S (1986) Critique on application of diaphragmatic time-tension index to spontaneously breathing humans. J Appl Physiol 60:1067–1072
    • View reference on PubMed
  15. Field S, Sanci S, Grassino A (1984) Respiratory muscle oxygen consumption estimated by the diaphragm pressure-time index. J Appl Physiol 57:44–51
    • View reference on PubMed
  16. Sassoon CS, Light RW, Lodia R, Sieck GC, Mahutte CK (1991) Pressure–time product during continuous positive airway pressure, pressure support ventilation, and T-piece during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 143:469–475
    • View reference on PubMed
  17. Pepe PE, Marini JJ (1982) Occult positive end–expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with airflow obstruction: the auto-PEEP effect. Am Rev Respir Dis 126:166–170
    • View reference on PubMed
  18. O’Donoghue FJ, Catcheside PG, Jordan AS, Bersten AD, McEvoy RD (2002) Effect of CPAP on intrinsic PEEP, inspiratory effort, and lung volume in severe stable COPD. Thorax 57:533–539
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  19. Tobin MJ, Lodato RF (1989) PEEP, auto-PEEP, and waterfalls. Chest 96:449–451
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  20. Gauthier R, Beyaert C, Feillet F, Peslin R, Monin P, Marchal F (1998) Respiratory oscillation mechanics in infants with bronchiolitis during mechanical ventilation. Pediatr Pulmonol 25:18–31
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  21. Rochester DF, Bettini G (1976) Diaphragmatic blood flow and energy expenditure in the dog. Effects of inspiratory airflow resistance and hypercapnia. J Clin Invest 57:661–672
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  22. Soust M, Walker AM, Berger PJ (1989) Diaphragm VO2, diaphragm EMG, pressure-time product and calculated ventilation in newborn lambs during hypercapnic hyperpnoea. Respir Physiol 76:107–117
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  23. Fauroux B, Hart N, Luo YM, MacNeill S, Moxham J, Lofaso F, Polkey MI (2003) Measurement of diaphragm loading during pressure support ventilation. Intensive Care Med 29:1960–1966
  24. Sinderby C, Navalesi P, Beck J, Skrobik Y, Comtois N, Friberg S, Gottfried SB, Lindström L (1999) Neural control of mechanical ventilation in respiratory failure. Nat Med 5:1433–1436
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website
  25. Stokes GM, Milner AD, Groggins RC (1981) Work of breathing, intra-thoracic pressure and clinical findings in a group of babies with bronchiolitis. Acta Paediatr Scand 70:689–694
    • View reference on PubMed
    • View reference on publisher's website

Sign In

Connect with ICM

Top 5 Articles Editors Picks Supplement