Log in | Register

Construction and psychometric testing of the EMPATHIC questionnaire measuring parent satisfaction in the pediatric intensive care unitOpen access

Jos M. Latour| Johannes B. van Goudoever| Hugo J. Duivenvoorden| Marcel J. I. J. Albers| Nicolette A. M. van Dam| Eugenie Dullaart| Marc van Heerde| Marjorie de Neef| Carin W. M. Verlaat| Elise M. van Vught| Jan A. Hazelzet
Pediatric Original
Volume 37, Issue 2 / February , 2011

Pages 310 - 318

Abstract

Purpose

To construct and test the reliability and validity of the EMpowerment of PArents in THe Intensive Care (EMPATHIC) questionnaire measuring parent satisfaction in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

Methods

Structured development and psychometric testing of a parent satisfaction-with-care instrument with the results of two cohorts of parents (n = 2,046) from eight PICUs in the Netherlands.

Results

In the first cohort, 667/1,055 (63%) parents participated followed by 551/991 (56%) parents in the second cohort. The empirical structure of the instrument was established by confirmatory factor analysis with the first sample of parents confirming 65 statements within five theoretically conceptualized domains: information, care and cure, organization, parental participation, and professional attitude. The standardized factor loadings were greater than 0.40 in 63 statements. Cronbach’s α, a measure of reliability, per domain ranged from 0.73 to 0.93 in both cohorts with no significant difference documenting the reliability over time. Beside rigorous content and face validity, the congruent validity of the instrument showed adequate correlation with four gold standard questions measuring overall satisfaction. The non-differential validity was confirmed with no significant differences between the population characteristics and the domains, except that parents with a child for a surgical admission were more satisfied on information issues.

Conclusions

The final EMPATHIC questionnaire incorporates 65 statements. The empirical structure of the satisfaction statements and domains was satisfactory. The reliability and validity proved to be adequate. The EMPATHIC questionnaire is a valid quality performance indicator to measure quality of care as perceived by parents.

Keywords

References

  1. Davis AL, Pollack MM, Cloup M, Cloup I, Wilkinson JD (1989) Comparisons of French and USA pediatric intensive care units. Resuscitation 17:143–152
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  2. Pollack MM, Holubkov R, Glass P, Dean JM, Meert KL, Zimmerman J, Anand KJ, Carcillo J, Newth CJ, Harrison R, Willson DF, Nicholson C (2009) Functional status scale: new pediatric outcome measure. Pediatrics 124:e18–e28
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  3. Knoester H, Bronner MB, Bos AP (2008) Surviving pediatric intensive care: physical outcome after 3 months. Intensive Care Med 34:1076–1082
  4. Conlon NP, Breatnach C, O’Hare BP, Mannion DW, Lyons BJ (2009) Health-related quality of life after prolonged pediatric intensive care unit stay. Pediatr Crit Care Med 10:41–44
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  5. Knoester H, Bronner MB, Bos AP, Grootenhuis MA (2008) Quality of life in children three and nine months after discharge from a paediatric intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:21–29
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  6. Grol R (2001) Improving the quality of medical care: building bridges among professional pride, payer profit, and patient satisfaction. JAMA 286:2578–2585
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  7. de Vos M, Graafmans W, Keesman E, Westert G, van der Voort PH (2007) Quality measurement at intensive care units: which indicators should we use? J Crit Care 22:267–274
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  8. Haines C, Childs H (2005) Parental satisfaction with paediatric intensive care. Paediatr Nurs 17:37–41
    • View reference on PubMed
  9. McPherson ML, Sachdeva RC, Jefferson LS (2000) Development of a survey to measure parent satisfaction in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 28:3009–3013
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  10. Latour JM, Hazelzet JA, Duivenvoorden HJ, van Goudoever JB (2009) Construction of a parent satisfaction instrument: perceptions of pediatric intensive care nurses and physicians. J Crit Care 24:255–266
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  11. Latour JM, van Goudoever JB, Duivenvoorden HJ, van Dam NA, Dullaart E, Albers MJ, Verlaat CW, van Vught EM, van Heerde M, Hazelzet JA (2009) Perceptions of parents on satisfaction with care in the pediatric intensive care unit: the EMPATHIC study. Intensive Care Med 35:1082–1089
  12. Latour JM, Hazelzet JA, van der Heijden AJ (2005) Parent satisfaction in pediatric intensive care: a critical appraisal of the literature. Pediatr Crit Care Med 6:578–584
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  13. Schreiber JB (2008) Core reporting practices in structural equation modeling. Res Social Adm Pharm 4:83–97
    • View reference on PubMed
  14. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York
  15. Department of Health, NHS (2009) NHS 2010–2015: from good to great. preventative, people-centred, productive. The Stationery Office, Norwich
  16. Wise J (2009) Part of hospitals’ funding will depend on patient satisfaction ratings from 2010–11. BMJ 339:b5451
    • View reference on publisher's website
  17. Cortese DA, Korsmo JO (2009) Putting US health care on the right track. N Engl J Med 361:1326–1327
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  18. Iglehart JK (2002) Changing health insurance trends. N Engl J Med 347:956–962
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  19. Endacott R, Benbenishty J, Seha M (2010) Preparing research instruments for use with different cultures. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 26:64–68
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  20. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, Erikson P (2005) Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health 8:94–104
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  21. Sitzia J, Wood N (1998) Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies. Int J Qual Health Care 10:311–317
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  22. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Reeves R, Bruster S, Richards N (2003) Properties of the picker patient experience questionnaire in a randomized controlled trial of long versus short form survey instruments. J Public Health Med 25:197–201
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  23. Latour JM, van Goudoever JB, Hazelzet JA (2008) Parent satisfaction in the pediatric ICU. Pediatr Clin North Am 55:779–790
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  24. Berenholtz SM, Dorman T, Ngo K, Pronovost PJ (2002) Qualitative review of intensive care unit quality indicators. J Crit Care 17:1–12
    • View reference on publisher's website
    • View reference on PubMed
  25. Kryworuchko J, Heyland DK (2009) Using family satisfaction data to improve the processes of care in ICU. Intensive Care Med 35:2015–2017

Sign In

Connect with ICM

Top 5 Articles Editors Picks Supplement